Interaction Effects due to Overloads and Underloads on Fatigue Crack Growth

Abstract:

Article Preview

Under constant amplitude loading, a single variable (K) or Kmax are required in crack growth relationships. The transferability of fatigue laws, obtained under constant amplitude loading to variable amplitude fatigue, requires at least an additional variable, whose evolution with crack length accounts for the interactions effects between cycles of different types. This paper presents an analysis of fatigue crack growth tests on M(T) specimens made of a medium carbon steel. The specimens are subjected to repeated blocks of cycles made up of one or several overloads separated by a variable number of baseline cycles and two baseline stress ratios. The main objective of this study is to better understand the mechanisms at the origin of interactions effects due to the presence of overloads (or underloads) at different locations of each block loading. Results have shown that the interaction effects are closely related to the cyclic plastic behaviour of the material and also the so-called Bauschinger effect.

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 348-349)

Edited by:

J. Alfaiate, M.H. Aliabadi, M. Guagliano and L. Susmel

Pages:

333-336

Citation:

F. Romeiro et al., "Interaction Effects due to Overloads and Underloads on Fatigue Crack Growth", Key Engineering Materials, Vols. 348-349, pp. 333-336, 2007

Online since:

September 2007

Export:

Price:

$38.00

[1] M. Skorupa, Empirical Trends and Prediction Models for Fatigue Crack Growth under Variable Amplitude Loading, Netherlands, Report, ECN-R-96-007 (1996).

[2] J.C. Jr. Newman. A Crack Closure Model for Predicting Fatigue Crack Growth under Aircraft Spectrum Loading. ASTM STP 748, Chang and Hudson, Eds., ASTM, PA, p.53 (1981).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1520/stp28334s

[3] R.C. McClung and H. Sehitoglu. On the Finite Element Analysis of fatigue Crack Closure-1. Basic Issue. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 33, 2, p.237 (1989).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944(89)90027-1

[4] R.C. McClung and H. Sehitoglu., On the Finite Element Analysis of fatigue Crack Closure-2. Numerical Results. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 33, 2, p.253 (1989).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944(89)90028-3

[5] Fatigue Crack Growth Computer Program, ESACRACK-NASA/FLAGRO User's Manual, theory and operation, ESA Publications Division, ESTEC, The Netherlands (1995).

[6] J.B. Jonge. The Crack Severity Index of Monitored Load Spectra, AGARD-AG-797, 77th. Meeting AGARD Structures and Materials Panel, pp.5-1 to 5-5 (1993).

[7] F. Romeiro, M. de Freitas and S. Pommier. Effect of Overloads and Underloads on Fatigue Crack Growth and Interaction Effects. ASTM STP 1439. McKeighan and Ranganathan, Eds., ASTM, PA (2003).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1520/jai19054

[8] S. Pommier and P. Bompard. Bauschinger Effect of Alloys and Plasticity-induced Crack Closure: A FEM Analysis. Fat & Fract of Eng Mat & Struct, Vol. 23, 1, p.129 (2000).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1460-2695.2000.00259.x

[9] S. Pommier. A Study on the Relationships between Variable Amplitude Fatigue Crack Growth and the Cyclic Constitutive Behaviour of an Alloy. Int. J. of Fatigue, Vol. 23 pp S111 (2001).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-1123(01)00165-7

[10] S. Pommier and M. Freitas. Effect on Fatigue Crack Growth of Interactions between Overloads. Fat. & Fract. of Eng. Mat & Struct, Vol. 25, p.709 (2002).

Fetching data from Crossref.
This may take some time to load.