Experimental Study on the Detection of Surface-Breaking Defects on Metal with the Scanning Laser Line Source Technique


Article Preview

The scanning laser line source (SLLS) technique is a novel laser-based inspection method for the ultrasonic detection of small surface-breaking defects. The SLLS approach is based on monitoring the change in laser generated ultrasound as a laser line source is scanning over a defect. It has provided enhanced signal-to-noise performance compared to the traditional pitch-catch or pulse-echo ultrasonic methods. In this paper, an experimental method is presented to detect surface acoustic waves (SAW) with polyvinylindene fluoride(PVDF) transducer. The ultrasonic signal is converted into electric signal by piezoelectricity of the PVDF, which is attached to a micro-knife edge clamped on a metal device. The SAW are excited by employing a pulsed Nd:YAG laser on aluminum plate with artificial surface-breaking defects. The laser line source is accurately shifted by the motorized translation stage, while the PVDF is located at a fixed position on the specimen. When the laser line source is scanning over the defect, the ultrasonic signals are monitored, meanwhile the characteristic changes in the amplitude and frequency content are observed. Consequently, the position of the defect can be determined by analyzing the obtained signals. The experimental system with high sensitivity provides a detection method of small surface-breaking defects on metal and gives convincing experimental evidence for the interaction mechanism between the SAW and the surface-breaking defects.



Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 364-366)

Edited by:

Guo Fan JIN, Wing Bun LEE, Chi Fai CHEUNG and Suet TO




G. Yan et al., "Experimental Study on the Detection of Surface-Breaking Defects on Metal with the Scanning Laser Line Source Technique ", Key Engineering Materials, Vols. 364-366, pp. 1117-1122, 2008

Online since:

December 2007




[1] C. B. Scruby and L. E. Drain: Laser Ultrasonics Adam Hilger, New York, (1990).

[2] J. Kautkrämer, H. Krautkrämer: Ultrasonic Testing of Materials, 4thed, Springer, New York, (1990).

[3] J. A. Cooper, R. A. Crosbie, R. J. Dewhurst, A. D. W. Mckie and S. B. Palmer: Transactions on ultrasonics, Ferroelectics and Frequency control. Vol. 33-5(1985), p.462.

[4] B. Masserey, E. Mazza: J. Acoust. Soc. Am. Vol. 118-6 (2005), p.3585.

[5] C. M. Scala and S. J. Bowles: Review of Progress in QNDE Vol. 19 (2000), p.327.

[6] J. R. Bernstein and J. B. Spicer: J. Acoust. Soc. Am. Vol. 111-4 (2002), p.1685.

[7] A. K. Kromine, P. A. Fomitchov, S. Krishnaswamy and J. D. Achenbach: Material Evaluation Vol. 58-2(2000), p.173.

[8] P. A. Fomitchov, A. K. Kromine, Y. Sohn, S. Krishnaswamy and J. D. Achhenbach: Review of Progress in QNDE Vol. 21A (2002), p.356.

[9] Y. Sohn and S. Krishnaswamy: Ultrasonics Vol. 39 (2002), p.543.

[10] I. Arias and J. D. Achenbach: wave Motion 39(2004), p.61.

[11] G. Yan, X. D. Xu, J. Lu, Z.H. Shen and X. W. Ni: Laser Technology Vol. 30-3 (2006), p.317.

[12] J. Lan, S. G. Boucher and R. H. Tancrell: IEEE ULTRASONICS SYMPOSIUM (1999), p.1109.

[13] L. F. Brown: IEEE Ultrason. Symp. vol. 1, (1993), p.539.


[15] Y. Sohn, S. Krishnaswamy: J. Acoust. Soc. Am. Vol. 115-1 (2004), p.172.

[16] J. F. Guan, Z. H. Shen, X. W. Ni, J. J. Wang, J. Lu and B. Q. Xu: J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. Vol. 39 (2006), p.1237.

Fetching data from Crossref.
This may take some time to load.