Performance Assessment of Design Electrode in Ultrasonic-Aided of Freeform Surface Finishing


Article Preview

The most effective geometry for design electrode and the advantage of low cost equipment in ultrasonic-aided electrochemical finishing for a freeform surface following turning machining was investigated. The proposed design process used an effective electrode instead of the mate electrode as in conventional ECM. Hence higher electrical current is not required when the effective design electrode is used to reduce the response area. Through simple equipment attachment, electrochemical finishing can follow the traditional cutting on the same machine. The controlled factors included the chemical composition and concentration of the electrolyte, the initial gap width, the flow rate of electrolyte, workpiece rotational speed, and die material. The design electrode is primarily discussed among the factors affecting the electrochemical finishing. The experimental parameters were current rating, electrode feed rate, frequency , power level of ultrasonics, and electrode geometry. The effective design electrode with small wedge angle and small edge rounding radius had an optimal value for higher current density and provided larger discharge space, which produce a smoother surface. The electrode of globe-shape with small radius performed best in the finishing process. The electrochemical finishing needed only a short time to make the workpiece smooth and bright and save the need for the precise process of traditional machining. The ultrasonic-aided electrochemical finishing is recommended for the finishing process of the freeform surface.



Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 364-366)

Edited by:

Guo Fan JIN, Wing Bun LEE, Chi Fai CHEUNG and Suet TO




P. S. Pa "Performance Assessment of Design Electrode in Ultrasonic-Aided of Freeform Surface Finishing", Key Engineering Materials, Vols. 364-366, pp. 680-685, 2008

Online since:

December 2007





[1] R.W. Wood: The Physical and Biological Effects of High-frequency Sound-waves of Great Intensity, Philosophical Magazine, Sept. 7, (1927) pp.417-436.

[2] L.D. Rozenberg, V.F. Kazemtsev, L.O. Makrov and D.F. Yakhimovich: Ultrasonic Cutting, Consultants Bureau, New York, (1964).

[3] H. Hocheng and C.C. Hsu.: Preliminary Study of Ultrasonic Drilling of Fiber-Reinforced Plastics, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 48 (1995), pp.255-266.

DOI: 10.1016/0924-0136(94)01657-m

[4] J.M. AZCUE: Comparison of Different Cleaning Procedures of Root Material for Analysis of Trace Elements, Intern. J. Environ. Anal. Chem., Vol. 62 (1995), pp.137-145.

[5] J. Wilson: Practice and Theory of Electrochemical Machining, (1971), pp.79-161.

[6] J. Bannard: Effect of Flow on the Dissolution Efficiency of Mild Steel during ECM, Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, Vol. 7 (1977), pp.267-270.

DOI: 10.1007/bf00618995

[7] M.A. LaBada and L.M. Mc Millan: A New Electrolyte for Electrochemical Machining, Electro. Tech., 5(7-8), (1967), pp.340-345.

[8] B.H. Kim, S.H. Ryu, D.K. Choi and C.N. Chu: Micro electrochemical milling, Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, Vol. 15 (2005), pp.124-129.

[9] P.S. Pa and H. Hocheng: Using Borer-Shape Electrode in Electrochemical Smoothing of Holes, Materials Science Forum, Vol. 505-507 (2006), pp.793-798.

DOI: 10.4028/

[10] S.S. Rao: Engineering Optimization. John Wiley and Sons, (1996).

[11] J.A. McGeough: Principles of Electrochemical Machining, (1974), pp.1-10.

Fetching data from Crossref.
This may take some time to load.