Sensitivity of Fatigue Crack Growth Data to Specimen Geometry


Article Preview

The formulations of fatigue crack growth prediction are still mostly based on phenomenological models. A commonly used formula in the field of high cycle fatigue is the Paris- Erdogan law. For given experimental conditions (such as temperature, stress ratio or environmental conditions) the parameters C and m have to be experimentally determined and considered as material constants. Thus, for a given material, the fatigue crack growth rate (FCGR) depends only on the applied range of the stress intensity factor. In a threshold region a significant shift in the data of the fatigue crack propagation rate can be observed. The shift is induced by different test specimen geometry. To analyses it the authors will present their own laboratory fatigue crack growth rate test data measured on two different specimens with different levels of constraint and for different steels. It is demonstrated that fatigue characteristics (i.e. C, m and Kth) obtained from different specimen geometries are not only properties of the materials but depends on the specimen geometry.



Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 385-387)

Edited by:

H.S. Lee, In Seok Yoon and Prof. Ferri M.H.Aliabadi




S. Seitl et al., "Sensitivity of Fatigue Crack Growth Data to Specimen Geometry", Key Engineering Materials, Vols. 385-387, pp. 557-560, 2008

Online since:

July 2008




[1] P Paris and F Erdogan, A critical analysis of crack propagation laws, Journal of Basic Engineering, Transactions of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1963, pp.528-534.

[2] ASTM Standard E647-00, Standard Method for Measurement of Fatigue Crack Growth Rates, ASTM 03. 01, (2004).

[3] Klesnil M., Lukáš P. Fatigue of metallic materials, Elsevier (1992).

[4] Anderson, T. L. Fracture Mechanics Fundamentals and Applications, Second Edition, 1995, CRC Press.

[5] Hutař, P., Seitl, S., Knésl, Z., Effect of constraint on fatigue crack propagation near threshold in medium carbon steel, Computational Materials Science, Vol. 37, 51-57, 2006 Dj.M. Maric, P.F. Meier and S.K. Estreicher: Mater. Sci. Forum Vol. 83-87 (1992).


[6] Garr K.R., Hresko G.C. III. A Size effect on the fatigue crack rate threshold of Alloy 718, ASTM STP 1372, pp.155-174.