Threshold Value of Particle Concentration in EPD: Experimental Evidence with TiO2 Organic Suspensions


Article Preview

This study was triggered by our experience on electrophoretic deposition (EPD) with different suspension systems showing evidence of a particle concentration threshold, below which no deposit was formed. In this study, the role of particle concentration in the mechanism of EPD was investigated with a model system, consisting of isopropanol suspensions with TiO2 nanosized particles (d50 = 130 nm). The investigated concentration range was 0.01 - 0.4 vol% TiO2. Constant voltage EPD tests with variable particle concentration were performed for 1 min under different applied voltages (25 - 300 V corresponding to 62.5 - 750 V/cm). A longer deposition time (30 min) was tested for a lower concentration value (0.003 vol% TiO2). The deposition process was evaluated in situ by means of the current measured during EPD. The deposits obtained were characterized by weight and profile measurements and scanning electron microscope (SEM). The results confirmed the finding of a lower limit value of particle concentration, determining a threshold in the formation of an EPD coating. Above this threshold, proportionality between deposited mass and particle concentration was observed, in agreement with the equation of Hamaker. Below this threshold, the proportionality was lost with evidence of a lack of coating formation. A possible interpretation for this experimental finding was provided.



Edited by:

A. R. Boccaccini, O. van der Biest, R. Clasen, T. Uchikoshi




S. Radice et al., "Threshold Value of Particle Concentration in EPD: Experimental Evidence with TiO2 Organic Suspensions", Key Engineering Materials, Vol. 412, pp. 51-56, 2009

Online since:

June 2009




[1] H. C. Hamaker, Transactions of the Faraday Society 35 (1940) 0279-0286.

[2] P. M. Biesheuvel, H. Verweij, Journal of the American Ceramic Society 82 (1999) 1451-1455.

[3] P. Sarkar, P. S. Nicholson, Journal Of The American Ceramic Society 79 (1996) 1987-(2002).

[4] B. Ferrari, R. Moreno, J. A. Cuesta, Key Engineering Materials 314 (2006) 175-180.

[5] E. de Beer, J. Duval, E. A. Meulenkamp, Journal Of Colloid And Interface Science 222 (2000) 117-124.

[6] R. Dittmann, J. Richter, A. Vital, D. Piazza, C. Aneziris, T. Graule, Advanced Engineering Materials 7 (2005) 354-360.

[7] B. Dobias Coagulation and flocculation: theory and applications; Marcel Dekker, Inc., 1993; Vol. 47.

[8] O. O. Van der Biest, L. J. Vandeperre, Annual Review of Materials Science 29 (1999) 327-352.

[9] N. Koura, T. Tsukamoto, H. Shoji, T. Hotta, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics Part 1Regular Papers Short Notes & Review Papers 34 (1995) 1643-1647.

[10] H. Negishi, K. Yamaji, T. Imura, D. Kitamoto, T. Ikegami, H. Yanagishita, Journal Of The Electrochemical Society 152 (2005) J16-J22.

DOI: 10.1149/1.1845301

[11] H. C. Hamaker, E. J. W. Verwey, Transactions of the Faraday Society 35 (1940) 0180-0185.

Fetching data from Crossref.
This may take some time to load.