Crack Closure Behavior under High-Load Ratio for AISI 4340 Steel


Article Preview

In this paper, fatigue crack growth rate (FCGR) analyses were conducted on compact specimens of an AISI 4340 alloy to study the behavior over a range in load ratios (0.1 ≤ R ≤ 0.95) and constant maximum stress intensity factor (Kmax) condition. Previous study had indicated that high R > 0.7 and constant Kmax test conditions near threshold conditions were suspected to be free of crack-closure and that any differences were caused by Kmax effects, from threshold to near fracture conditions. Cracks in high-cycle fatigue (HCF) components spend a large portion of their fatigue life near threshold conditions. In order to characterize the evolution of damage and crack propagation during these conditions, fatigue crack growth rate (FCGR) data at threshold and near-threshold conditions are essential in predicting service life and in determining the proper inspection intervals. Fatigue crack growth model, namely the Forman model were examined, this model implicit the effect of R ratio and ease of curve fitting to measured data. The Forman model may be suggested for use in critical applications in studying fatigue crack growth for different load ratios.



Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 462-463)

Edited by:

Ahmad Kamal Ariffin, Shahrum Abdullah, Aidy Ali, Andanastuti Muchtar, Mariyam Jameelah Ghazali and Zainuddin Sajuri




M. A. Razzaq et al., "Crack Closure Behavior under High-Load Ratio for AISI 4340 Steel", Key Engineering Materials, Vols. 462-463, pp. 54-58, 2011

Online since:

January 2011




[1] J.M. Barsom: J Engng Ind. Vol. 93 (1971), p.1190.

[2] Jr AJ . McEvily, W. Illg: The rate of fatigue-crack propagation in two aluminum alloys NACA TN. 4394 (1958).

[3] W. Elber: Engng Fract Mech Vol. 2(1) (1970), p.37.

[4] W. Elber: ASTM STP 486. American Society for Testing and Materials (1971). 22: 23042.

[5] N. Walker and C.J. Beevers: Fatigue Engng Mater Struct. Vol 1(1) (1979), p.48.

[6] P.C. Paris, R.J. Bucci, E.T. Wessel, W.G. Clark and T.R. Mager: ASTM STP 513. (1972), p.76.

[7] Jr. J.C. Newman: The Netherlands: Delft University Press, (1992).

[8] Jr. J.C. Newman: ASTM STP-1372. (2000), p.51.

[9] B.R. Kirby and C.J. Beevers: Fatigue Fract Engng Mater Struct. Vol. 1 (1979), p.203.

[10] S. Suresh, Zaminski, R.O. Ritchie: MetallTrans. Vol. A12A (1981), p.43.

[11] W. Herman, R. Hertzberg and R. Jaccard: Fatigue Engng Mater Struct. Vol. 11(4) (1988), p.20.

[12] J.K. Donald, G.H. Bray and R.W. Bush: American Society for Testing and Materials. ASTM STP1332. (1999), p.674.

[13] J.A. Newman, W.T. Riddell and R.S. Piascik: ASTM STP-1372 (2009), p.63.

[14] S.W. Smith and R.S. Piascik: PA: American Society for Testing and Materials. ASTM STP-1372 (2000), p.109.

[15] A.K. Vasudevan, K. Sadananda, Louat: Mater Sci Engng. Vol. A188 (1994), p.1.

[16] Jr J.C. Newman, J.B. Jordon, E.L. Anagnostou, D. Fridline and D. Rusk: In Aging Aircraft Conference, Phoenix, AZ. April (2008).

Fetching data from Crossref.
This may take some time to load.