Apatite-Based Microcarriers for Bone Tissue Engineering

Abstract:

Article Preview

The current available microcarriers were mainly targeted towards pharmaceutical industries, and might not be suitable for therapeutic implantation. As such, apatite-based microcarriers intended for bone tissue engineering applications would be featured here. Hydroxyapatite-Alginate (HA-Alg) suspension was extruded drop-wise into a calcium chloride (CaCl2) crosslinking solution. The HA-Alg microcarriers were then sintered to form microcarriers of uniform size. The physicochemical properties were analysed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffractometery (XRD), and fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrophotometry. Cell viability on these microcarriers was evaluated using human fetal mesenchymal stem cells (hfMSCs). SEM images revealed that sintered apatite-based microcarriers exhibited a rough surface topology with interconnected pores. XRD results showed that these microcarriers remained phase pure since no other secondary calcium phosphate phases were detected. FTIR analysis indicated several sharp phosphate bands coupled with a hydroxyl band (all belonging to HA). Live/dead staining showed that hfMSCs remained viable after 14 days of culture, and cells have spread and covered the surfaces of the microcarriers. Certainly, these cell-loaded microcarriers could be potentially used in bone implant science.

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 529-530)

Main Theme:

Edited by:

Kunio Ishikawa and Yukihide Iwamoto

Pages:

34-39

Citation:

J. Feng et al., "Apatite-Based Microcarriers for Bone Tissue Engineering", Key Engineering Materials, Vols. 529-530, pp. 34-39, 2013

Online since:

November 2012

Export:

Price:

$38.00

[1] Frank O, Heim M, Jakob M, Barbero A, Schafer D, Bendik I, Dick W, Heberer M, Martin I. Real-time quantitative RT-PCR analysis of human bone marrow stromal cells during osteogenic differentiation in vitro. J Cell Biochem (2002) 85 (4): 737-746.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.10174

[2] Qi H, Aguiar DJ, Williams SM, Pean AL, Pan W, Verfaillie CM. Identification of genes responsible for osteoblast differentiation from human mesenchymal progenitor cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2003) 100 (6): 3305-3310.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0532693100

[3] Mauney JR, Volloch V, Kaplan DL. Role of adult mesenchymal stem cells in bone tissue engineering applications: Current status and future prospects. Tissue Eng (2005) 11 (5-6): 787-802.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.2005.11.787

[4] Reddig PJ, Juliano RL. Clinging to life: Cell to matrix adhesion and cell survival. Cancer Metastasis Rev (2005) 24 (3): 425-439.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10555-005-5134-3

[5] Abbah SA, Lu WW, Peng SL, Aladin DMK, Li ZY, Tan WK, Cheung KMC, Luk KDK, Zhou GQ. Extracellular matrix stability of primary mammalian chondrocytes and intervertebral disc cells cultured in alginate-based mircobead hydrogels. Cell Transplantation (2008).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3727/096368908787236648

[6] Liu JY, Hafner J, Dragieva G, Burg G. High yields of autologous living dermal equivalents using porcine gelatine microbeads as microcarriers for autologous fibroblasts. Cell Transplantation (2006) 15 (5): 445-451.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3727/000000006783981855

[7] Zangi L, Rivkin R, Kassis I, Levdansky L, Marz G, Gorodetsky R. High-yield isolation, expansion and differentiation of rat bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells with fibrin microbeads. Tissue Eng (2006) 12 (8): 2343-2354.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.2006.12.2343

[8] Griffith B. Scale-up of suspension and anchorage-dependent animal cells. Molecular Biotechnology (2001) 17 (3): 225-238.

[9] Johanson A, Nielson V. Biosilon a new microcarrier. Dev Biol Stand (1980) 46: 125-129.

[10] Varani J, Dame M, Beals TF, Wass JA. Growth of three established cell lines on glass microcarriers. Biotech Bioeng (1983) 25(5): 1359-1372.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.260250515

[11] Perez RA, Valle SD, Altankov G, Ginebra MP. Porous hydroxyapatite and gelatin/hydroxyapatite microspheres obtained by calcium phosphate cement emulsion. J Biomed Mater Res (2011) 97B (1): 156-166.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.31798

[12] Qiu QQ, Ducheyne P, Ayyaswamy PS. New bioactive, degradable composite microspheres as tissue engineering substrates. J Biomed Mater Res (2000) 52 (1): 66-76.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4636(200010)52:1<66::aid-jbm9>3.0.co;2-2

[13] Sikavitsas VI, Temenoff JS, Mikos AG. Biomaterials and bone mechanotransduction. Biomater (2001) 22 (19): 2581-2593.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-9612(01)00002-3

[14] Rehman I, Bonfield W. Characterisation of hydroxyapatite and carbonated apatite by photo acoustic FTIR spectroscopy. J Mater Sci: Mater Med (1997) 8 (1): 1-4.