Improving the Flexural Strength Test of Brushite Cement


Article Preview

In the investigation of mechanical properties, calcium phosphate cements exhibit large sample-to-sample deviation due to its porous nature, possibility of unhomogenous distribution and small specimen size. This situation generates difficulties for obtaining accurate results and creates an obstacle for testing different composition where only a small batch size is available. In this respect, specimen shape, whether being injected, porosity ratio, surface quality, bearing support design have significant matter on variability in terms of three-and four-point bending test. Therefore, different methods have been studied to reduce variability with a simpler material preparation than common methods on injected and moulded cement. The entire comparison is made with the consideration of three-and four-point bending testing, the eccentric loading error calculation with engineering calculation software “Mathcad 15”, porosity measurement with Archimedes method, microstructure investigation on Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM), macro-porosity distribution measurement by Micro CT Scanner.



Main Theme:

Edited by:

Maria-Pau Ginebra, Cristina Canal, Montserrat Espanol, Edgar B. Montufar and Roman A. Perez




S. Altundal et al., "Improving the Flexural Strength Test of Brushite Cement", Key Engineering Materials, Vol. 631, pp. 67-72, 2015

Online since:

November 2014




* - Corresponding Author

[1] I.D. Baere, W.V. Paepegem, J. Degrieck, Design of a three- and four-point bending setup for fatigue testing of fibre-reinforced thermoplastics, FirW Phd Symposium (2005).

[2] Engstrand, J. Cecilia, P. Engqvist, H., The effect of composition on mechanical properties of brushite cements, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, 29 (2014) 81-90.


[3] C. Robo, Study of calcium phosphate cements, Industrial memorial report, ETSEiB/BIBITE, (2013).

[4] D.A. Stewardson, A.C. Shortall, P.M. Marquis, P.J. Lumley, The flexural properties of endodontic post materials, 26 (2010) 730–736.


[5] G.D. Quinn, B.T. Sparenberg, P. Koshy, L.K. Ives, S. Jahanmir, D. D. Arola, Flexural Strength of Ceramic and Glass Rods, Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 37 (2009) 1-22.


[6] ASTM Standard C158-95, Standard Test Methods of Flexure Testing of Glass (Determination of the Modulus of Rupture), 15. 02 (1998).

[7] S. Lamberet, Durability of ternary binders based on Portland cement, calcium aluminate cement and calcium sulfate: École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne, Institute of Materials, Lyon, France, (2005).

[8] M.H. Dielhof, L.J.M.G. Dortmans, G. de With, Fractography of Borosilicate Glass Tested in Three- and Four-Point Bending, Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 12 (1993) 215-220.


[9] G.D. Quinn, J.B. Quinn, A practical and systematic review of Weibull statistics for reporting strengths of dental materials, Dental Materials, 26 (2009) 135-147.


[10] S. Wakayama, T. Kawakami, S. Kobayashi, M. Aizawa, A. Nozue, Acoustic Emission From Acoustic Emission from Micro-Fracture Processes of Bio-Ceramics in Simulated Body Environment, Journal of Acoustic Emission, 21 (2004) 149-157.

[11] G. D. Quinn, Weibull Effective Volumes and Surfaces for Cylindrical Rods Loaded in Flexure, Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 86 (2003) 475-479.


[12] P.J. Bates, C.Y. Wang, The Effect of Sample Preparation on The Flexural Strength of Reinforced Nylon 66, Polymer Engineering and Science, 43 (2003) 759–773.