An Intelligent and Confident System for Automatic Surface Defect Quantification in 3D


Article Preview

Automatic surface defect inspection within mass production of high-precision components is growing in demand and requires better measurement and automated analysis systems. Many manufacturing industries may reject manufactured parts that exhibit even minor defects, because a defect might result in an operational failure at a later stage. Defect quantification (depth, area and volume) is a key element in quality assurance in order to determine the pass or failure criterion of manufactured parts. Existing human visual analysis of surface defects is qualitative and subjective to varying interpretation. Non-contact and three dimensional (3D) analyses should provide a robust and systematic quantitative approach for defect analysis. Various 3D measuring instruments generate point cloud data as an output, although they work on different physical principles. Instrument’s native software processing of point cloud data is often subject to issues of repeatability and may be non-traceable causing significant concern with data confidence.This work reports the development of novel traceable surface defect artefacts produced using the Rockwell hardness test equipment on flat metal plate, and the development of a novel, traceable, repeatable, mathematical solution for automatic defect detection and quantification in 3D. Moreover, in order to build-up the confidence in automatic defect analysis system and generated data, mathematical simulated defect artefacts (soft-artefact) have been created. This is then extended to a surface defect on a piston crown that is measured and quantified using a parallel optical coherence tomography instrument integrated with 6 axis robot. The results show that surface defect quantification using implemented solution is efficient, robust and more repeatable than current alternative approaches.



Edited by:

Fang-Jung Shiou, Jeng-Ywan Jeng and Liang-Kuang Chen




M. Tailor et al., "An Intelligent and Confident System for Automatic Surface Defect Quantification in 3D", Key Engineering Materials, Vol. 649, pp. 46-53, 2015

Online since:

June 2015




* - Corresponding Author

[1] Lou S, Jiang X, Scott P, Application of the morphological alpha shape method to the extraction of topographical features from engineering surfaces, Measurement, 46(2), 1002-1008, (2013).


[2] Cubero, S, Aleixos, N, Moltó, E, Gómez-Sanchis, J, Blasco, J, Advances in machine vision applications for automatic inspection and quality evaluation of fruits and vegetables, Food and Bioprocess Technology, 4(4), 487-504, (2011).


[3] Martínez, S, Ortega, J, García, J, García, A, A machine vision system for defect characterization on transparent parts with non-plane surfaces, Machine Vision and Applications, 23(1), 1-13, (2012).


[4] Lin H, Computer-aided visual inspection of surface defects in ceramic capacitors chips, J. Mater. Process Technol., 189(1), 19-25, (2007).

[5] Tsai D, Huang T, Automated surface inspection for statistical textures, Image Vision Comput., 21(4), 307-323, (2003).

[6] Tsai D, Lai S, Defect detection in periodically patterned surfaces using independent component analysis, Pattern Recognit., 41(9), 2812-2832, (2008).


[7] Li W, Tsai D, Automatic saw-mark detection in multicrystalline solar wafer images, Solar Energy Mater. Solar Cells, 95(8), 2206-2220, (2011).


[8] ISO 16610 series. Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) – Filtration. (2010).

[9] Lou S, Zeng W, Jiang X, Scott PJ. Robust filtration techniques in geometrical metrology and their comparison, International Journal of Auto. Comput., 10(1), 1-8, (2013).

[10] ISO 8785. Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) – Surface imperfection. Terms, definitions and parameters, (1999).

[11] ISO 25178-2. Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) – Surface texture: areal. Part 2. Terms, definitions and surface texture parameters, (2010).


[12] ISO 6508-1. Metallic material. Rockwell hardness test. Test method, (2006).