Optimization of EDM Drilling Parameters for Aluminum 2024 Alloy Using Response Surface Methodology and Genetic Algorithm


Article Preview

AA 2024 alloy is widely used as a structural material in aerospace applications. Its excellent strength to weight ratio makes it suitable for the subsequent application. The aerospace application required close tolerances and accuracy in the machined parts. Henceforth non-conventional machining processes are widely used for different machining operations such as drilling through holes. In the present study, Electrical Discharge Machining (EDM) process is used to drill through holes in 5mm thick AA 2024 alloy material. With the aim of reducing the difference between finished diameter of drilled hole and intended diameter, computational technologies were adopted for optimization. Mathematical models were developed using Response Surface methodology (RSM), and subsequently Genetic Algorithm (GA) was used to reach a set of input parameters in order to give minimum difference in diameter. Three input parameters such as current (I), Pulse on time (Ton) and Pulse off time (Toff) were selected. The ANOVA results indicated that developed models were adequate and robust. The GA based approach in conjugation with RSM was able to locate a single set of parameters which gave minimum difference in diameter. Confirmation test was again carried out and the difference between predicted and measured value was negligible.



Edited by:

Guojian Chen, Haider F. Abdul Amir, Puneet Tandon, Poi Sim Khiew




S. Dave et al., "Optimization of EDM Drilling Parameters for Aluminum 2024 Alloy Using Response Surface Methodology and Genetic Algorithm", Key Engineering Materials, Vol. 706, pp. 3-8, 2016

Online since:

August 2016




* - Corresponding Author

[1] Marcos-Bárcena M, Sebastián-Pérez M, Contreras-Samper J, Sánchez-Carrilero M, Sánchez-López M, Sánchez-Sola J. Study of roundness on cylindrical bars turned of aluminium–copper alloys UNS A92024. Journal of materials processing technology 162(2005).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.02.061

[2] Fersini D, Pirondi A. Fatigue behaviour of Al2024-T3 friction stir welded lap joints. Engineering fracture mechanics 74(2007)468-80.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.07.010

[3] Jeelani S, Musial M. Effect of cutting speed and tool rake angle on the fatigue life of 2024-T351 aluminium alloy. International journal of fatigue 6(1984)169-72.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-1123(84)90034-3

[4] Yadav RN, Yadava V. Application of Soft Computing Techniques for Modeling and Optimization of Slotted-Electrical Discharge Diamond Face Grinding Process. Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals 1(2015)-10.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-015-0536-6

[5] Kumar SV, Kumar MP. Machining process parameter and surface integrity in conventional EDM and cryogenic EDM of Al–SiC p MMC. Journal of Manufacturing Processes 20(2015)70-8.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2015.07.007

[6] Rashed C, Romoli L, Tantussi F, Fuso F, Burgener M, Cusanelli G, et al. Water jet guided laser as an alternative to EDM for micro-drilling of fuel injector nozzles: A comparison of machined surfaces. Journal of Manufacturing Processes 15(2013).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2013.08.002

[7] Jahan M, Wong Y, Rahman M. Evaluation of the effectiveness of low frequency workpiece vibration in deep-hole micro-EDM drilling of tungsten carbide. Journal of Manufacturing Processes 14(2012)343-59.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2012.07.001

[8] Teimouri R, Baseri H. Effects of magnetic field and rotary tool on EDM performance. Journal of Manufacturing Processes 14(2012)316-22.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2012.04.002

[9] Balasubramanian P, Senthilvelan T. A Comparative study on the Performance of Different Sintered Electrodes in Electrical Discharge Machining. Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals 68(2015)51-9.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-014-0430-7

[10] Su J, Kao J, Tarng Y. Optimisation of the electrical discharge machining process using a GA-based neural network. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 24(2004)81-90.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-003-1729-4

[11] Panda DK, Bhoi RK. Artificial neural network prediction of material removal rate in electro discharge machining. Materials and Manufacturing Processes 20(2005)645-72.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1081/amp-200055033

[12] Somashekhar K, Ramachandran N, Mathew J. Optimization of material removal rate in micro-EDM using artificial neural network and genetic algorithms. Materials and Manufacturing processes 25(2010)467-75.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10426910903365760

[13] Samanta S, Chakraborty S. Parametric optimization of some non-traditional machining processes using artificial bee colony algorithm. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 24(2011)946-57.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2011.03.009

[14] Sivaprakasam P, Hariharan P, Gowri S. Modeling and analysis of micro-WEDM process of titanium alloy (Ti–6Al–4V) using response surface approach. Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal 17(2014)227-35.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2014.06.004

[15] Kurt M, Kaynak Y, Bagci E. Evaluation of drilled hole quality in Al 2024 alloy. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 37(2008)1051-60.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-007-1049-1