On the Effects of Hydrothermal Treatments on the Corrosion Resistance of the TSA Anodized AA7475-T761 Alloy


Article Preview

The effect of hydrothermal treatment time on sealing and corrosion resistance of the AA7475-T761 anodized aluminium alloy has been investigated in this study. The hydrothermal treatments tested are environmental compatible without chromium ions involved. Anodizing was carried out by a tartaric-sulphuric anodizing (TSA) process and this was followed by hydrothermal treatments for partial sealing, in various solutions. The effect of propyleneglycol (PRG) and/or cerium ions in the hydrothermal treatment solution was evaluated. Four treatment times were tested, specifically, 2.5, 5.0, 7.5 and 10 min. The corrosion resistance of the anodized and treated samples was evaluated by Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) and the anodic layers formed were characterized by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). The EIS results showed that the hydrothermal treatments in solutions with cerium ions resulted in similar impedances for periods of treatment from 5 to 10 min whereas in the solutions with PRG the impedance increased with time of treatment from 2.5 to 10 min showing a slower kinetics of anodic layer sealing. However, the fastest kinetics of sealing were associated to the treatments that combined two steps, one in PRG and other in cerium containing solutions with similar impedances obtained from 2.5 to 10 min of treatment. Surface evaluation by SEM showed that the porosities in the anodic layer were not sealed for the periods of hydrothermal treatments corresponding to 2.5 min. The presence of cerium in hydrothermal treatment had a beneficial effect on the stability of the anodic layer formed and provided a healing effect on the corroding sites.



Edited by:

Federico M. Mazzolani, Francesco Bellucci, Beatrice Faggiano, Antonino Squillace






T. L. Almeida et al., "On the Effects of Hydrothermal Treatments on the Corrosion Resistance of the TSA Anodized AA7475-T761 Alloy", Key Engineering Materials, Vol. 710, pp. 169-174, 2016

Online since:

September 2016




* - Corresponding Author

[1] V.R. Capelossi, M. Poelmanc, I. Reclouxa, R.P.B. Hernandez,; H.G. de Melo, M.G. Oliveira, Corrosion protection of clad 2024 aluminum alloy anodized intartaric-sulfuric acid bath and protected with hybrid sol–gel coating, Electrochimica Acta. 124 (2014).

DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.09.004

[2] K. Dejun, W. Jinchun, Salt spray corrosion and electrochemical corrosion properties of anodic oxide film on 7475 aluminum alloy, Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 632 (2015) 286–290.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.01.175

[3] V. Moutarlier, M.P. Gigandet, B. Normand, J. Pagetti, EIS characterisation of anodic films formed on 2024 aluminium alloy, in sulphuric acid containing molybdate or permanganate species, Corrosion Science. 47 (2005) 937-951.

DOI: 10.1016/j.corsci.2004.06.019

[4] G. Boisier, N. Pébère, C. Druez, M. Villatte, S. Suel, FESEM and EIS Study of Sealed AA2024 T3 Anodized in Sulfuric Acid Electrolytes: Influence of Tartaric Acid, Journal of The Electrochemical Society. 155 (2008) C521-C529.

DOI: 10.1149/1.2969277

[5] F.M. Reis, H.G. de Melo, I. Costa, EIS investigation on Al 5052 alloy surface preparation for self-assembling monolayer, Electrochimica Acta. 51 (2006) 1780-1788.

DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2005.02.118

[6] M.A. Arenas, A. Conde, J.J. de Damborenea, Effect of acid traces on hydrothermal sealing of anodising layers on 2024 aluminium alloy, Electrochimica Acta. 55 (2010) 8704–8708.

DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2010.07.089

[7] M. García-Rubio, P. Ocón, M. Curioni, G.E. Thompson, P. Skeldon, A. Lavía, I. García, Degradation of the corrosion resistance of anodic oxide films through immersion in the anodising electrolyte, Corrosion Science. 52 (2010) 2219–2227.

DOI: 10.1016/j.corsci.2010.03.004

[8] X. Zhao, Y. Zuo, J. Zhao, J. Xiong, Y. Tang, A study on the self-sealing process of anodic films on aluminum by EIS, Surface & Coatings Technology. 200 (2006) 6846-6853.

DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2005.10.031

[9] L.E.M. Palomino, V.I. Aoki, H.G. de Melo, Microstrutural and electrochemical characterization of Ce conversion layers formed on Al alloy 2024-t3 covered with Cu-rich smut, Electrochimica Acta. 51 (2006) 5943-5953.

DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2006.03.036

[10] M. Dabalà, L. Armelao, A. Buchberger, I. Calliari, Cerium-based conversion layers on aluminum alloys, Applied Surface Science. 172 (2001) 312-322.

DOI: 10.1016/s0169-4332(00)00873-4

[11] P. Campestrini, H. Terryn, A. Hovestad, J.H.W. de Wit, Formation of a cerium-based conversion coating on AA2024: relationship with the microstructure, Surface and Coatings Technology. 176 (2004) 365-381.

DOI: 10.1016/s0257-8972(03)00743-6

[12] M. van Soestbergen, S.J.F. Erich, H.P. Huinink, O.C.G. Adan, Inhibition of pH fronts in corrosion cells due to the formation of cerium hydroxide, Electrochimica Acta. 110 (2013) 491– 500.

DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.03.148

[13] F. Mansfeld, C.B. Breslin, A. Pardo, F.J. Pérez, Surface modification of stainless steels: green technology for corrosion protection, Surface and Coatings Technology. 90 (1997) 224-228.

DOI: 10.1016/s0257-8972(96)03142-8

[14] F. Mansfeld, Use of Rare Earth Metal Salt Solutions for Corrosion Protection of Aluminum Alloys and Mild Steel. 36 (2000) 1063-1071.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02757525

[15] R.G. Buchheit, S.B. Mamidipally, P. Schmutz, H. Guan, Active corrosion protection in Ce-modified hydrotalcite conversion coatings, Corrosion. 58 (2002), 3-14.

DOI: 10.5006/1.3277303

[16] A. Decroly, J.P. Petitjean, Study of the deposition of cerium oxide by conversion on to aluminium alloys, Surface and Coatings Technology. 194 (1) (2005) 1-9.

DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.05.012

In order to see related information, you need to Login.