Experimental Study on Extremely Low-Cycle Material Fatigue Resistance for Two Types of Welded Structural Details


Article Preview

Extremely low-cycle fatigue and fracture is one of the most critical damage types of the welded beam-to-column connections when the steel frame subjected to the strong earthquake excitation. The investigation on extremely low cycle fatigue behavior of welded structural details is useful for the fatigue design of welded structure. In the present study, extremely low cycle material fatigue tests were carried out to examine the fatigue failure mechanism of two types of welded structural details, which were the plate butt weld (PB) specimen and cruciform load-carrying groove weld (CLG) specimen. Fatigue tests were performed on 12 welded specimens under strain-controlled constant loading in the plastic range. The fitting S-N curves of the two types were presented. The fatigue S-N curves of the similar welded structural details in IIW Fatigue Recommendation was adopted to correlate the fatigue resistance of the two types of welded structural details. The results demonstrated that the failure mode of PB specimens was not the same as that of CLG specimens. The extremely low-cycle material fatigue strength of the investigated welded structural details was lower than expected high cycle fatigue S-N curves provided by IIW, showing shorter fatigue lives, which indicated that the cumulative damage of welded details involved ductile damage besides cyclic fatigue damage in extremely low-cycle fatigue situation.



Edited by:

Jung Kyu Ahn




L. Z. Huang et al., "Experimental Study on Extremely Low-Cycle Material Fatigue Resistance for Two Types of Welded Structural Details", Key Engineering Materials, Vol. 730, pp. 364-368, 2017

Online since:

February 2017




* - Corresponding Author

[1] E. P. Popov, T. S. Yang, S. P. Chang, Design of steel MRF connections before and after 1994 Northridge earthquake, Eng. Struct. 20(12) (1998) 1030-1038.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0141-0296(97)00200-9

[2] J. M. Ricles, J. W. Fisher, L. W. Lu, et al. Development of improved welded moment connections for earthquake-resistant design, J. Constr. Steel Res. 58(5-8) (2002) 56-604.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0143-974x(01)00095-5

[3] G. Ballio, C. A. Castiglioni, A unified approach for the design of steel structures under low/or high cycle fatigue, J. Constr. Steel Res. 34(1) (1995) 75-101.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0143-974x(95)97297-b

[4] K. Tateishi, T. Hanji, Low cycle fatigue strength of butt-welded steel joint by means of new testing system with image technique, Int. J. Fatigue, 26 (2004) 1349-1356.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2004.03.016

[5] J. W. Hu, Response of Seismically Isolated Steel Frame Buildings with Sustainable Lead-Rubber Bearing (LRB) Isolator Devices Subjected to Near-Fault (NF) Ground Motions. Sustainabil. 7 (2015) 111-137.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su7010111

[6] J. W. Hu, Investigation on the Cyclic Response of Superelastic Shape Memory Alloy (SMA) Slit Damper Devices Simulated by Quasi-Static Finite Element (FE) Analyses. Mater. 7 (2014) 1122-1141.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma7021122

[7] K. Iida, Y. Kho, H. Nagai, Low cycle reversed bending fatigue curve of 9% Ni steel and weld metal, J. Soc. Naval Archit. Japan, 138 (1975) 403-409.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2534/jjasnaoe1968.1975.138_403

[8] J. Ferreira, C. A. Castiglioni, L. Calado, M. Rosaria Agatino, Low cycle fatigue strength assessment of cruciform welded joints, J. Constr. Steel Res. 47(3) (1998) 223-244.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0143-974x(98)00003-0

[9] C. H. Lee, K. H. Chang, G. C. Jang, et al. Effect of weld geometry on the fatigue life of non-load-carrying fillet welded cruciform joints, Eng. Fail. Anal. 16(3) (2009) 849-855.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2008.07.004

[10] S. Kainuma, I. T. Kim, Fatigue strength evaluation of load-carrying cruciform fillet-welded joints made with mild steel plates of different thickness, Int. J. Fatigue, 27(7) (2005) 810-816.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.01.002

[11] J. Weigand, J. Berman, Behavior of butt-welds and treatments using low-carbon steel under cyclic inelastic strains, J. Constr. Steel Res. 75 (2012) 45-54.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2012.03.007

[12] A. Hobbacher, Recommendations for Fatigue Design of Welded Joints and Components, International Institute of Welded, XIII-2151-07/XV-1254-07. IIW Collection, (2007).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23757-2

[13] M. Kuroda, Extremely low cycle fatigue life prediction based on a new cumulative fatigue damage model, Int. J. Fatigue, 24(6) (2002) 699-703.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-1123(01)00170-0

[14] K. Tateishi, T. Hanji, K. Minami, A prediction model for extremely low cycle fatigue strength of structural steel, Int. J. Fatigue, 29(5) (2007) 887-896.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.08.001

Fetching data from Crossref.
This may take some time to load.