Mechanical Behavior of Masonry Specimens Strengthened by Carbon Bundles Subjected to a Splitting Test

Abstract:

Article Preview

In this study the results of an experimental campaign that involves masonry specimens subjected to a purposely designed splitting test are presented. The specimens are reinforced in the mortar joints by means of carbon bundles impregnated with a water based resin. Unreinforced specimens are also tested for comparison purposes. Some specimens are characterized by an initial crack obtained artificially by cutting the bricks to highlight the crack arrestor function of the carbon bundles. Results show that the failure mechanism from brittle becomes ductile and a load bearing capacity increment is registered in reinforced specimens.

Info:

Periodical:

Edited by:

Angelo Di Tommaso, Prof. Cristina Gentilini and Giovanni Castellazzi

Pages:

518-524

Citation:

A. Di Tommaso et al., "Mechanical Behavior of Masonry Specimens Strengthened by Carbon Bundles Subjected to a Splitting Test", Key Engineering Materials, Vol. 747, pp. 518-524, 2017

Online since:

July 2017

Export:

Price:

$41.00

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Franzoni, E. et al., 2015. Compressive behaviour of brick masonry triplets in wet and dry conditions. Construction and Building Materials, 82, p.45–52.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.02.052

[2] Franzoni, E. et al., 2014. Towards the assessment of the shear behaviour of masonry in on-site conditions: A study on dry and salt/water conditioned brick masonry triplets. Construction and Building Materials, 65, p.405–416.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.05.002

[3] Castellazzi, G., Gentilini, C. & Nobile, L., 2013. Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of a Historical Church : Limit Analysis and Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis. Advances in Civil Engineering 2013, 517454.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/517454

[4] Valluzzi, M., Modena, C. & de Felice, G., 2014. Current practice and open issues in strengthening historical buildings with composites. Materials and Structures, 47(12), p.1971–(1985).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-014-0359-7

[5] Focacci, F. & Carloni, C., 2015. Periodic variation of the transferable load at the FRP-masonry interface. Composite Structures, 129, p.90–100.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.03.008

[6] Valdés, M., Concu, G. & Nicolo, B. De, 2015. FRP Strengthening of Masonry Columns : Experimental Tests and Theoretical Analysis. Key Engineering Materials, p.2–9.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.624.603

[7] Borri, A., Castori, G. & Marco, C., 2015. Behavior of masonry columns repaired using small diameter cords. Key Engineering Materials, 624, p.254–265.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.624.254

[8] Maragna M., Casacci S., Gentilini C., In-plane shear behavior of masonry wall panels strengthened by structural repointing,. International Journal of Masonry Research and Innovation, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp.253-276, (2016).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/ijmri.2016.10001411

[9] Valluzzi, M.R., Binda, L. & Modena, C., 2005. Mechanical behaviour of historic masonry structures strengthened by bed joints structural repointing. Construction and Building Materials, 19(1), p.63–73.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2004.04.036

[10] Casacci, S., di Tommaso, A. & Gentilini, C., 2015. Crack Propagation in Compression and Mounted Arrestors. Key Engineering Materials, 624, p.595–602.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.624.595

[11] Sutton MA, Orteu J-J, Schreier HW (2009), Image correlation for shape, motion and deformation measurements: basic concepts, theory and applications. Springer.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-78747-3

[12] Hillerborg, A., 1991. Application of the fictitious crack model to different types of materials. International Journal of Fracture, 51(2), p.95–102.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3638-9_7