Characterization and Modelling of Multiple Intralaminar Cracking Initiation under Tensile Quasi-Static and Fatigue Loading


Article Preview

The first failure mode in tensile quasi-static and in tension-tension fatigue (cyclic) loading of composite laminates is intralaminar cracking in layers with off-axis fiber orientation. These tunnel-building cracks are result of combined action of in-plane transverse and shear stresses. We assume that due to non-uniform fiber distribution (clustering) which leads to local stress concentrations, different positions in the layer have different resistance to crack initiation (initiation strength). If so, the weakest position in quasi-static loading is also the weakest in fatigue and some of the distribution parameters for fatigue behavior can be obtained in quasi-static tests, thus significantly reducing the number of required fatigue tests. Methodology is suggested and validated for cases when the cracking is initiation governed-initiated crack almost instantly propagates along fibers. Distribution parameters are identified using data in low crack density region where stress perturbations from cracks do not interact. Monte-Carlo simulations are performed for cracking in layers under quasi-static and cyclic loading using novel approach for computationally efficient stress state calculation between existing cracks.



Edited by:

Luis Rodríguez-Tembleque, Jaime Domínguez and Ferri M.H. Aliabadi




H. Ben-Kahla and J. Varna, "Characterization and Modelling of Multiple Intralaminar Cracking Initiation under Tensile Quasi-Static and Fatigue Loading", Key Engineering Materials, Vol. 774, pp. 467-472, 2018

Online since:

August 2018




[1] Parvizi A, and Bailey J, Journal of Materials Science, 13(10), (1978), 2131-2136.

[2] Quaresimin M, Carraro PA, LP Mikkelsen, N Lucato, L Vivian, P Brøndsted, BF Sørensen, J Varna, R Talreja, Composites Part B: Engineering, 61, (2014), 282-290.


[3] Varna J, J. of Composite Materials, 47(20-21), (2013), 2443-2474.

[4] Kashtalyan M, C Soutis, Composites: Part A 38, (2007), 1262-1269.

[5] Kashtalyan M, Soutis C., Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 41, (2005):152-173.

[6] Sandino, C, Correa E, and París F, Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 168, Part B, (2016), 58-75.

[7] Zhuang L, Pupurs A, Varna J, Talreja R, Ayadi Z, Composites Part A, (2018), 109, 463-471.

[8] Varna J, Zhuang L, Pupurs A, Ayadi Z, Key Engineering Materials,v754, (2017), 63-66.

[9] Herráez M, D Mora, F Naya, CS Lopes, C González, J LLorca, Composites Science and Technology, 110, (2015), 196-204.

[10] Carraro PA, L Maragoni, M Quaresimin, Composites Science and Technology, 145, (2017), 24-39.

[11] Varna J and H Zrida, Mechanics of Composite Materials, vol. 53(1), (2017), 45-58.

[12] Varna J, Crack separation based models for microcracking, Elsevier, Comprehensive Composite Materials II, (2018), Vol. 2, 192-220.