Robust and Reliability-Based Design Optimization of a Composite Floor Beam

Abstract:

Article Preview

This study investigates the advantages and disadvantages of using probabilistic optimization methods in aircraft structural design. The necessity to achieve a design insensitive to system's variations (robust) and less likely to fail (reliable) is addressed, in order to reduce costs and risk of accidents. Because of the complex nature of composite structures, the need of surrogate models to predict structural responses arises. In order to build a meta-model, Design of Experiments (DOE) methods are used to determine the location of sampling points in the design space. Monte Carlo Simulations (MCS), creating random samples, are used to propagate uncertainties from the surrogate model inputs to variations in model outputs. Different optimization algorithms and surrogate models are compared, in order to speed up the optimization process and reduce modelling errors. The deterministic design resulted in a design which is neither robust nor reliable. Stochastic approaches accounting for uncertainties, on the other hand, resulted in enhanced robustness (Robust Design), enhanced reliability (Reliable Design) or a combination of both (Robust and Reliable Design).

Info:

Periodical:

Edited by:

Luis Rodríguez-Tembleque, Jaime Domínguez and Ferri M.H. Aliabadi

Pages:

486-491

Citation:

F. Sbaraglia et al., "Robust and Reliability-Based Design Optimization of a Composite Floor Beam", Key Engineering Materials, Vol. 774, pp. 486-491, 2018

Online since:

August 2018

Export:

Price:

$38.00

[1] Kang, Z., Robust design optimization of structures under uncertainties. 2005, University of Stuttgart.

[2] Bacarreza, O., Aliabadi,MH and Apicella,A Robust design and optimization of composite stiffened panels in post-buckling. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2015. 51(2): pp.409-422.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-014-1136-5

[3] Paiva, RM., Crawford,C and Suleman,A Robust and Reliability-Based Design Optimization Framework for Wing Design. 2014. 52(4): pp.711-724.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j052161

[4] Amandio, L., et al., Stochastic optimization in aircraft design. 2014: pp.267-272.

[5] Lagaros, NV. Plevris, and Manolis,P Reliability based robust design optimization of steel structures. 2007. 1: pp.19-29.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/ijsmdo:2007003

[6] Schueller, G.I. and Jensen, HA Computational methods in optimization considering uncertainties - An overview. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2008. 198(1): pp.2-13.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2008.05.004

[7] Jin, RW., Chen, et al., Comparative studies of metamodelling techniques under multiple modelling criteria. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2001. 23(1): pp.1-13.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-001-0160-4

[8] Oberkampf, W.L., et al., Error and uncertainty in modeling and simulation. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2002. 75(3): pp.333-357.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0951-8320(01)00120-x

[9] Lopez, C., et al., Reliability-based design optimization of composite stiffened panels in post-buckling regime. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2017. 55(3): pp.1121-1141.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-016-1568-1

[10] Forrester, A.I.J., et al., Engineering Design via Surrogate Modelling. 2008: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.

[11] Simpson, T., et al., On the Use of Statistics in Design and the Implications for Deterministic Computer Experiments. (1997).

[12] Wahde, M., Biologically inspired optimization methods: an introduction. 2008: WIT Press.

[13] A. Giunta, AS. et al, Overview of modern design of experiments methods for computational simulations. AIAA, 2003. 0649.

[14] Bacarreza,O, Aliabadi,MH Robust Multilevle Design Optimization, Chapter 5, In Buckling and Postbuckling Strucutres II, Eds: Falzon,BG and Aliabadi,MH, World Scientific,(2018).

Fetching data from Crossref.
This may take some time to load.