An Effective Impact Detection Method for Composite Curved Panel


Article Preview

ANNs are only accurate for the scope of the given training data which is not suitable for real life impact localisation due to the large range of possible impact variation. Impact data was collected for a variation of impact cases (angle, mass and energy) on a sensorized curved composite panel. From observation of the obtained data, a robust signal Time of Arrival (TOA) extraction method is proposed using a Normalised Smooth Envelope Threshold (NSET) which is a modification of the currently known Normalised Threshold (NT) method. Two ANNs were trained using TOA extracted with the NT and NSET method from a baseline case and tested with TOA extracted from cases having added variation of impact condition. The results show that the proposed NSET method results in more accurate results for impact cases different to the training case and thus allows for only a single impact training case to accurately predict cases with multiple variation. This enhances the applicability of ANNs for impact localisation in real life conditions.



Edited by:

Luis Rodríguez-Tembleque, Jaime Domínguez and Ferri M.H. Aliabadi




A. H. Seno et al., "An Effective Impact Detection Method for Composite Curved Panel", Key Engineering Materials, Vol. 774, pp. 529-534, 2018

Online since:

August 2018




[1] Abrate S. Impact on composite structures. Cambridge university press; (2005).

[2] Sharif Khodaei Z, Ferri Aliabadi MH. Impact Detection and Identification with Piezoceramic Sensors: Passive Sensing. Computational and Experimental Methods in Structures [Internet]. WORLD SCIENTIFIC (EUROPE); 2018 [cited 2018 Apr 11]. p.215.


[3] Fawcett AJ, Oakes GD. Boeing composite airframe damage tolerance and service experience. Composite Damage Tolerance & Maintenance Workshop. (2006).

[4] Kim H, DeFrancisci G, Chen ZM, et al. Impact damage formation on composite aircraft structures. UCSD FAA JAMS Paper, Technical Review Meeting. (2012).

[5] Su Z, Ye L. Identification of damage using Lamb waves: from fundamentals to applications. Springer Science & Business Media; (2009).

[6] Coverley PT, Staszewski WJ. Impact damage location in composite structures using optimized sensor triangulation procedure. Smart Materials and Structures. 2003;12:795–803.


[7] Kundu T, Nakatani H, Takeda N. Acoustic source localization in anisotropic plates. Ultrasonics. 2012;52:740–746.


[8] Staszewski WJ, Mahzan S, Traynor R. Health monitoring of aerospace composite structures – Active and passive approach. Composites Science and Technology. 2009;69:1678–1685.


[9] Matt HM, Scalea FL di. Macro-fiber composite piezoelectric rosettes for acoustic source location in complex structures. Smart Materials and Structures. 2007;16:1489–1499.


[10] Jang B-W, Lee Y-G, Kim J-H, et al. Real‐time impact identification algorithm for composite structures using fiber Bragg grating sensors. Structural Control and Health Monitoring. 2012;19:580–591.


[11] Morse L, Sharif Khodaei Z, Aliabadi MH. Reliability based impact localization in composite panels using Bayesian updating and the Kalman filter. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing. 2018;99:107–128.


[12] Yue N, Sharif Khodaei Z. Assessment of Impact Detection Techniques for Aeronautical Application: ANN vs. LSSVM. Journal of Multiscale Modelling. 2016;07:1640005.


[13] Sung D-U, Oh J-H, Kim C-G, et al. Impact Monitoring of Smart Composite Laminates Using Neural Network and Wavelet Analysis. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures. 2000;11:180–190.


[14] Mallardo V, Aliabadi MH, Khodaei ZS. Optimal sensor positioning for impact localization in smart composite panels. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures. 2013;24:559–573.


[15] Sharif Khodaei Z, Ghajari M, Aliabadi MH. Determination of impact location on composite stiffened panels. Smart Materials and Structures. 2012;21:105026.