Determination of Mixed-Mode Cohesive Zone Failure Parameters Using Digital Volume Correlation and the Inverse Finite Element Method


Article Preview

The suitability of an optimisation workflow for the determination of the mixed-mode cohesive zone model parameters using digital volume correlation (DVC) data and the inverse finite element method was examined. A virtual compression experiment of a cylinder with a spherical inclusion was modelled using the finite element method. A bilinear traction separation law with a linear mixed-mode relationship was used to describe the interfacial behaviour. Known mode I and mode II fracture energies, = 20 J/m2 and = 40 J/m2 and damage initiation stress, = 0.09 MPa, were used to generate a target composite debonding behaviour. An objective function,, determined based on the debonding behaviour measurable by DVC was chosen. A full factorial experiment was carried out for the four cohesive parameters and showed that correlation between fracture energies/ damage initiation stresses and is non-linear and discontinuous with multiple local minima. Optimisations initiated at the local minima identified from the full factorial experiment correctly determined the target cohesive fracture energies and damage initiation stresses.



Edited by:

Luis Rodríguez-Tembleque, Jaime Domínguez and Ferri M.H. Aliabadi




J.Y.S. Li-Mayer et al., "Determination of Mixed-Mode Cohesive Zone Failure Parameters Using Digital Volume Correlation and the Inverse Finite Element Method", Key Engineering Materials, Vol. 774, pp. 72-76, 2018

Online since:

August 2018




* - Corresponding Author

[1] Arora H, Tarleton E, Li-Mayer J, Charalambides MN, Lewis D. Modelling the damage and deformation process in a plastic bonded explosive microstructure under tension using the finite element method. Computational Materials Science. 2015;110:91-101.


[2] Martinez M. Particulate composite material internal deformation measurements using x-ray microtomography and digital volume correlation: University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, (2017).

[3] Lundstedt T, Seifert E, Abramo L, Thelin B, Nyström Å, Pettersen J, et al. Experimental design and optimization. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems. 1998;42.


[4] Van der Velden A, Koch P. Isight design optimization methodologies. ASM Handbook: Application of Metal Processing Simulations. 2010;22B.