Modelling Zener Pinning: A Comparison of Different Computer Simulation Methods


Article Preview

We compare the ability of three different types of microstructural model to simulate particle pinning. The microstructural models are the Phase Field model, the Front Tracking model and the Monte Carlo Potts model. The same 3D test geometry is simulated using each method. This is an hexagonal network with spherical particles located at the centre of each hexagonal grain. The hexagonal grain network provides a constant driving force for a moving boundary and includes triple line and quadruple point motion. This geometry allows detailed investigation of the boundary/particle interaction. The pinning force acting on the migrating curved grain boundary is calculated and compared with theoretical predictions for each model.



Materials Science Forum (Volumes 467-470)

Edited by:

B. Bacroix, J.H. Driver, R. Le Gall, Cl. Maurice, R. Penelle, H. Réglé and L. Tabourot




A. Harun et al., "Modelling Zener Pinning: A Comparison of Different Computer Simulation Methods", Materials Science Forum, Vols. 467-470, pp. 1033-1038, 2004

Online since:

October 2004




[1] C. Zener, quoted by S. C. Smith in Trans. AIME 175, 1948, pp.47-58.

[2] P. Hellman and M. Hillerts, Scandinavian Journal of Metallurgy, No. 4, 1975, pp.211-219.

[3] D. Fan and L. Q. Chen, Acta Mater., No. 45, 1997, p.611.

[4] D. Fan and L. Q. Chen, Acta Mater., No. 45, 1997, p.1115.

[5] L. Q. Chen, Scr Matall., No. 32, 1995, p.115.

[6] FOAM, http: /www. nabla. com, V 2. 2, September (2003).

[7] D. J. Srolovitz, M. P. Anderson, P. S. Sahni and G. S. Grest Acta Mater., No. 32, 1984, p.793.

[8] M. P. Anderson, G. S. Grest, R. D. Doherty, K. Li, and D. J. Srolovitz, Scripta Metal., No. 23, 1989, p.753.

[9] M. Miodownik, J. W. Martin and A. Cerezo, Philosophical Magazine A, Vol. 79, No. 1, 1999, p.203.

[10] K. A. Brakke, http: /www. susqu. edu/brakke, V 2. 20, August 20, (2003).

Fetching data from Crossref.
This may take some time to load.