Effects of Overall Grain Boundary Nature on Localized Corrosion in Austenitic Stainless Steels


Article Preview

Thermo-mechanical processing of type 304 and type 316L stainless steels done by (a) cold rolling to a reduction in thickness of 20 to 80 percent and (b) solution annealing to obtain a medium size of grains led to a considerable improvement in resistance to both sensitization and intergranular corrosion. The nature of the resultant grain boundaries was examined in a scanning electron microscope using orientation imaging microscopy in electron back scattered diffraction mode. Fraction of random and special grain boundaries were established for each set of thermo-mechanical processing. After appropriate sensitization treatments, the degrees of sensitization of these stainless steels were evaluated by double loop electrochemical potentiokinetic reactivation tests. Standard ASTM tests were used to evaluate susceptibility to intergranular corrosion (IGC) and intergranular stress corrosion cracking (IGSCC). These studies showed that a particular combination of thermomechanical processing led to formation of over 75 percent random grain boundaries in the steels and this imparted resistance to sensitization and to IGC and IGSCC. This opens a new concept in grain boundary (GB) engineering of a high fraction of random GB increasing the resistance to localized corrosion like IGC and IGSCC. Textural studies were carried out with the help of X-ray and MTM-FHM software. It showed significant change of texture in type 304 stainless steel, while no change in the texture of type 316L stainless steel after cold rolling and annealing.



Materials Science Forum (Volumes 467-470)

Edited by:

B. Bacroix, J.H. Driver, R. Le Gall, Cl. Maurice, R. Penelle, H. Réglé and L. Tabourot




D.N. Wasnik et al., "Effects of Overall Grain Boundary Nature on Localized Corrosion in Austenitic Stainless Steels", Materials Science Forum, Vols. 467-470, pp. 813-818, 2004

Online since:

October 2004




[1] T. Watanabe, Res. Mechanica, Vol. 11 (1984), p.47.

[2] B. W. Bennett, and H. W. Pickering, Metall. Trans. A, Vol. 18(1987), p.1117.

[3] G. Palumbo, and K. T. Aust, Acta metall. mater., Vol. 38 (1990), p.2343.

[4] K. T. Aust, U. Erb, and G. Palumbo, Mater. Sci. Engg, A, Vol. 176 (1994), p.329.

[5] P. Lin, G. Palumbo, U. Erb, U. and K.T. Aust, Scripta metall. mater., Vol. 33 (1995), p.1387.

[6] G. Palumbo, and K.T. Aust, Can. Metall. Q., Vol. 34 (1995), p.165.

[7] E .M. Lehockey, G. Palumbo, P. Lin, and A. Brennenstuhl, Metall. Trans. A Vol. 29 (1998), p.387.

[8] H. J. Bunge, Texture Analysis in Materials Science, Mathematical Methods, (Butterworth, London, Publisher, 1982).

[9] P. Van Houtte, Manual of MTM-FHM, ed. MTM-KU, Leuven, Belgium, (1995).

[10] D. G. Brandon, Acta metall., Vol. 30 (1966), p.1479.

[11] A. P. Majidi, and M. A. Streicher, Corrosion, 40, Vol. 11 (1984), p.584.

[12] ASTM Annual Book of Standards, 3. 01 (2000).

[13] G. Palumbo, K.T. Aust, U. Erb, P.J. King, A. M. Brennenstuhl, and P.C. Lichtenberger, Phy. State. Sol (o), Vol. 131 (1992), p.425.