Direct Tensile Tests of Individual WS2 Nanotubes


Article Preview

The Young’s modulus of WS2 nanotubes is an important property for various applications. Measurements of the mechanical properties of individual nanotubes are challenging because of the small size of the tubes. Lately, measurements of the Young’s modulus by buckling of an individual nanotube using an atomic force microscope1 resulted in an average value of 171GPa. Tensile tests of individual WS2 nanotubes were performed experimentally using a scanning electron microscope and simulated tensile tests of MoS2 nanotubes were performed by means of a densityfunctional tight-binding (DFTB) based molecular dynamics (MD) scheme. Preliminary results for WS2 nanotubes show Young’s modulus value of ca.162GPa, tensile strength value of ca. 13GPa and average elongation of ca. 12%. MD simulations resulted in elongation of 19% for zigzag and 17% for armchair MoS2 single wall nanotubes. Since MoS2 and WS2 nanotubes have similar structures the same behavior is expected for both, hence there is a good agreement regarding the elongation of WS2 nanotubes between experiment and simulation.



Materials Science Forum (Volumes 475-479)

Main Theme:

Edited by:

Z.Y. Zhong, H. Saka, T.H. Kim, E.A. Holm, Y.F. Han and X.S. Xie




I. Kaplan-Ashiri et al., "Direct Tensile Tests of Individual WS2 Nanotubes", Materials Science Forum, Vols. 475-479, pp. 4097-4102, 2005

Online since:

January 2005





[1] 1. I. Kaplan-Ashiri, S.R. Cohen, G. Gartsman, R. Rosentsveig, G. Seifert, R. Tenne: J. Mater. Res. Vol. 19 (2004), p.454.


[2] 2. R. Tenne, L. Margulis, M. Genut, G. Hodes: Nature Vol. 360 (1992), p.444.

[3] 3. R. Rosentsveig, A. Margolin, Y. Feldman, R. Popovitz-Biro, R. tenne: Chem. Mat. Vol. 14 (2002), p.471.

[4] 4. A. Margolin, R. Rosentsveig, A. Albu-Yaron, R. Popovitz-Biro, R. Tenne: J. Mater. Chem. Vol. 14 (2004), p.617.

[5] M.M.J. Treacy, T.W. Ebbesen, J.M. Gibson: Nature Vol. 381 (1996), p.678.

[6] O. Lourie, D.M. Cox, H.D. Wagner: Phys. Rev. Lett. Vol. 81 (1998), p.1639.

[7] O. lourie, H.D. Wagner: J. Mater. Res. Vol. 13(1998), p.2418.

[8] J. Salvetat, G. Andrew, D. Broggs, J. Bonard, R.R. Bacsa, A.J. Kulik, T. Stockli, N.A. Burnham, L. Forro: Phys. Rev. Lett. Vol. 82 (1999), p.944.


[9] W. Shen, B. Jiang, B.S. Han, S. Xie, : Phys. Rev. Lett. Vol. 84 (2000), p.3634.

[10] M. Yu, T. Kowalewski, R.S. Ruoff: Phys. Rev. Lett. Vol. 85 (2000), p.1456.

[11] M. Yu, O. Lourie, M.J. Dyer, K. Moloni, T.F. Kelly, R.S. Ruoff: Science Vol. 287 (2000), p.637.

[12] C.A. Cooper, S.R. Cohen, A.H. Barber, H.D. Wagner: Appl. Phys. Lett. Vol. 81 (2002), p.3875.

[13] S. Washburn, R. Superfine: Phys. Rev. Lett. Vol. 89 (2002), pp.255502-1.

[14] H.E. Troiani, M. Miki-Yoshida, G.A. Camacho-Bragado, M.A.L. Marques, A. Rubio, J.A. Ascenio, M. Jose-Yacaman: Nano Lett. Vol. 3 (2003), p.751.

[15] 15.A.H. Barber, S.R. Cohen, H.D. Wagner: Appl. Phys. Lett. Vol. 82 (2003), p.4141.

[16] B.I. Yakobson, P. Avouris: Topics Appl. Phys. Vol. 80 (2001), p.287.

[17] K.N. Kudin, G.E. Scruseria, B.I. Yakobson: Phys. Rev. B Vol. 64 (2001), p.235406.

[18] Y.Q. Zhu, T. Sekine, K.S. Brigatti, S. Firth, R, Tenne, R. Rosentsveig, H.W. Kroto, and D.R.M. Walton: J. Am. Chem. Soc, Vol. 125 (2003), p.1329.


[19] H. Dai, J. h. Hafner, A.G. Rinzler, D.T. Colbert, R.E. Smalley: Nature, Vol. 384 (1996), p.147.

[20] J.M. Gere: Mechanics of Materials (5th edition) (Brooks/Cole, Australia 2001).

[21] W.D. Callister: Materials Science and Engineering (5th edition) (Wiley, New-York 2000).