Comparative Study between Natural and Artificial Zeolites as Supports for Biosorption Systems

Abstract:

Article Preview

This study aims the definition of a new material that may act as a robust and yet cost effective biosorbent for treatment of wastewater with low concentration of heavy metals. A comparative study was made between two biosorption systems composed of an Arthrobacter viscosus biofilm supported on Cuban natural zeolites and on prepared NaY and NaX, in terms of their ability to retain ionic chromium. The bacterium is able to reduce Cr(VI) to Cr(III) and, only then, this smaller and positive ion may be entrapped in the zeolite cages by ion exchange. The first support was tested in a continuous flow semi-packed bed column. The highest removal ratio, 42%, was achieved for initial chromium concentration of 10 mg/L, but the best up-take, 5.5 mg/gzeolite, was obtained for initial concentration of 70 mg/L. Biosorbents prepared with the same biofilm supported in NaY and NaX zeolites were also considered in batch studies, with a typical kinetics of biosorption processes, reaching 20% of initial chromium removal within an initial range of Cr(VI) concentration between 50 and 250 mg/L. These last structures were characterized by spectroscopic methods (FTIR and ICP-AES), surface analysis (DRX) and thermal analysis (TGA). All these techniques indicated that the biosorption process does not modify the morphology and structure of the FAU-zeolites.

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 514-516)

Edited by:

Paula Maria Vilarinho

Pages:

1294-1298

DOI:

10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.514-516.1294

Citation:

M. T. Tavares et al., "Comparative Study between Natural and Artificial Zeolites as Supports for Biosorption Systems", Materials Science Forum, Vols. 514-516, pp. 1294-1298, 2006

Online since:

May 2006

Export:

Price:

$35.00

[1] J.R. Duncan, D. Brady and A. Stoll, Environ. Technol. No. 15 (1994) 429.

[2] A. Scott and S.J. Palmer, Cadmium bio-sorption by bacterial exopolysaccharide. Biotechnol. Lett, 1988, 10: 21-24.

DOI: 10.1007/bf01030018

[3] C. Quintelas and T. Tavares, Removal of chromium(VI) and cadmium(II) from aqueous solution by a bacterial biofilm supported on granular activated carbon, Biotecnol. Letters, Vol. 23 (2001) 1349.

[4] M.V. Mier, R.G. Callegas, R. Gear, B.E.J. Cisneros and P.J.J. Alvares, Heavy metal removal with Mexican clinoptilolite: multi-component ionic exchange. Wat. Res., 2001, 25: 373-378.

[5] R. Arriagada, R. Garcia and R. Cid, Retention of chromium and mercury with natural and synthetic zeolites. In Catalizadores y adsorbentes para la protección ambiental en la región Iberoamericana, Ed. J. Blanco, P. Avila, CYTED, Madrid, 2001, pp.207-211.

[6] M.T. Tavares, C. Martins and P. Neto, Biotreatment of Cr (VI) Effluents. In Hazardous and Industrial Wastes, Sengupta, AK, ed., Lancaster: Tecnomics Publishing Co., 1995, pp.223-232.

[7] M. Batista, M. Laza, G.R. Fuentes and J.L. Ruiz, Preparation and characterisation of a natural zeolites modified with the cationic surfactant BR-HDTMA, for Cr (VI) removal, Jornadas Iberoamericanas de Catálisis Ambiental, p.294, Universidad Internacional de Andalucía, (2000).

[8] M.A. Barros, N. Machado, E. Sousa-Aguiar, F. Alves and S. Pedroza, Removal of Cr 3+ from industrial and synthetic wastewater by naturally occurring clinoptilolite. In Catalizadores y adsorbentes para la protección ambiental en la región Iberoamericana, Ed. J. Blanco, P. Avila, CYTED, Madrid, 2001, pp.219-224.

In order to see related information, you need to Login.