Quantitative Characterization of Pore Arrangement in Pore Bands in Pressure Die Cast AZ91 Magnesium Alloy by Image Processing

Abstract:

Article Preview

Microporosity is the major processing defect in pressure die cast AZ91 magnesium alloy. There is a big difference in the arrangement of pores in different regions of the castings. The present work explains the pore arrangement in pore bands and other regions. Quantification and characterization of pores in pore bands is expected to be useful to understand the process-propertymicrostructure correlation. A computational microstructural (image) analyzing technique has been developed by a programming language to quantify and analyze the micropores in pore bands. The pore band regions and the rest were separated and quantified. In addition, image analyzing technique was used to measure the clustering tendency of porosity in pore bands and it was compared with other regions.

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 514-516)

Edited by:

Paula Maria Vilarinho

Pages:

1477-1482

DOI:

10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.514-516.1477

Citation:

D. G. L. Prakash and D. Regener, "Quantitative Characterization of Pore Arrangement in Pore Bands in Pressure Die Cast AZ91 Magnesium Alloy by Image Processing", Materials Science Forum, Vols. 514-516, pp. 1477-1482, 2006

Online since:

May 2006

Export:

Price:

$35.00

[1] S. Schumann and F. Friedrich: Papers presented at the conference Magnesium alloys and their applications, Wolfsburg, Germany, April 28-30, (1998), p.3.

[2] B.L. Mordike, T. Ebert: Mater. Sci. Eng A, Vol. A302 (2001), p.37.

[3] A.L. Bowles, T.J. Bastow, C.J. Davidson, J.R. Griffiths, PDD. Rodrigo: Magnesium Technology 2000, The Minerals, Metals and Materials Society, Nashville, USA, (2000), p.295.

[4] M. Dargush, G.L. Dunlop, C.H. Caceres: Proceddings of the 3 rd international magnesium conference, Mansester, UK, Institute of Metals, (1996), p.153.

[5] H. Mayer, M. Papakyriacou, B. Zettl, SE Stanzl-Tschegg: Int j Fatigue Vol. 25 (2003), p.245.

[6] W.P. Sequeira, G.L. Dunlop, M.T. Murray: CRC for Alloy and Solidification Technology (CAST), The University of Queenland, St. Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia, pp.169-183.

[7] A.K. Dahle, S. Sannes, D.H. St. John and H. Westengen: J Light Met, Vol. 1, (2001), p.99103.

[8] A.K. Dahle and D.H. StJohn: Acta Mater, Vol. 47 (1998), pp.31-41.

[9] A.K. Dahle and D.H. StJohn: T99-062, NADCA 20th International Die Casting Congress and Exposition, Cleveland, USA, (1999), pp.205-212.

[10] M.K. Surappa, E. Blank, J.C. Jaquet: Scripta Metall, Vol. 20 (1986), p.1281.

[11] N.U. Deshpande, A.M. Gokhale, D.K. Denzer, JOHN Liu: Metall Mater Trans A, Vol. 29A (1998), p.1191.

[12] J.P. Anson, J.E. Gruzleski: AFS Trans, Vol. 26 (1999), p.135.

[13] D.G. Leo Prakash, D. Regener: Prakt metallogr-Pr M, accepted.

[14] A. Balasundaram, A.M. Gokhale: Mater charact, Vol. 46 (2001), p.419.

[15] D.W. Fanning: IDL Programming Techniques (Published by Fanning Software Consulting, United States of America September 1999).

[16] S. Chhabra, P. Chhillar, S. Sangal: Prakt metallogr-Pr, Vol. 40 (2003), p.85.

[17] P. Baudhuin, M.A. Leory-Houyet, J. Quintart, P. Berthet: J microsc, Vol. 115 (1979), p.1.

[18] M. Dobbertin, A. Baltensweiler, D. Rigling: Forest ecol manag, Vol. 145 (2001), p.79.

In order to see related information, you need to Login.