Mechanical Stress Gradients in Thin Films Analyzed Employing X-Ray Diffraction Measurements at Constant Penetration/Information Depths


Article Preview

Stress gradients have been investigated employing a measurement strategy for diffraction measurements at constant penetration/information depths. Two examples have been considered: (i) sputter-deposited copper thin films on silicon wafers and (ii) γ’-Fe4N1-x layers on α-Fe substrates obtained by gaseous nitriding. In the Cu thin films rather low tensile stresses, increasing in magnitude with increasing penetration/information depth have been found. An evaluation of the measured lattice strains has been performed on the basis of the f(ψ) method, where the X-ray elastic constants (XEC’s) have been calculated as weighed averages of the corresponding Voigt and Reuss XEC’s and the weighing parameter has been taken as a fitting parameter. This evaluation reveals that the grain interaction changes with increasing penetration/information depth from near-Reuss type towards Neerfeld-Hill type. In the γ’-Fe4N1-x layers stress gradients occur due to surface relaxation near the surface and deeper in the layer due to a nitrogen concentration gradient which is built up during nitriding. First measurements in a laboratory diffractometer show the effect of surface relaxation on the stress-depth profile near the surface. As no single-crystal elastic constants are available for γ’-Fe4N1-x, the mechanical elastic constants have been employed in diffraction stress analysis. The results indicated that single-crystal elastic anisotropy occurs. From the measured data also a concentration – depth profile has been deduced.



Materials Science Forum (Volumes 524-525)

Edited by:

W. Reimers and S. Quander




M. Wohlschlögel et al., "Mechanical Stress Gradients in Thin Films Analyzed Employing X-Ray Diffraction Measurements at Constant Penetration/Information Depths ", Materials Science Forum, Vols. 524-525, pp. 19-24, 2006

Online since:

September 2006




[1] U. Welzel, J. Ligot, P. Lamparter, A.C. Vermeulen and E.J. Mittemeijer: J. Appl. Cryst. Vol. 38 (2005), p.1.

[2] A. Kumar, U. Welzel and E.J. Mittemeijer: submitted.

[3] J. -D. Kamminga, Th.H. de Keijser, E.J. Mittemeijer and R. Delhez: J. Appl. Cryst. Vol. 33 (2000), p.1059.

[4] M.A.J. Somers and E.J. Mittemeijer: Metall. Trans. A Vol. 21A (1990), p.189.

[5] T. Christiansen and M.A.J. Somers: Mater. Sci. Forum Vol. 443-444 (2004), p.91.

[6] M. Leoni, U. Welzel and P. Scardi: J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. Vol. 109 (2004), p.27.

[7] U. Welzel and E.J. Mittemeijer: Powder Diffr. Vol. 20 (2005), p.376.

[8] M.A.J. Somers, N.M. van der Peers, D. Schalkoord and E.J. Mittemeijer: Metall. Trans. A Vol. 20A (1989), p.1533.

[9] T. Gressmann, M. Wohlschlögel, S. Shang, A. Leineweber, U. Welzel and E.J. Mittemeijer: In preparation Acknowledgements. The assistance provided by Ms U. Eigenthaler in the SEM investigations of the Cu layers is gratefully acknowledged.

Fetching data from Crossref.
This may take some time to load.