Diffraction Post-Processor for Polycrystalline Plasticity Modelling

Abstract:

Article Preview

Microscopic and macroscopic deformation of a polycrystal due to an applied load can be modelled using crystal plasticity implemented within the Finite Element (FE) framework. However, while macroscopic predictions can readily be validated against conventional monotonic and cyclic stress-strain curves, verification at the microscopic level is harder to achieve, since it involves calibrating the predictions for stresses and strains in individual grains, or in grains grouped by certain criteria (e.g., orientation). In this paper an elasto-plastic polycrystal finite element model is introduced, and its calibration is performed at a mesoscopic level via comparison with neutron diffraction data obtained experimentally. Time-of-flight (TOF) neutron diffraction experiments carried out on ENGIN-X instrument at ISIS involved in situ loading of samples of C263 nickel-based superalloy. In order to compare the numerical predictions of the FE model with these experimental data, the corresponding mesoscale average elastic strains must be extracted from the results of the simulation by employing a ‘diffraction post-processor’. This provides a much improved technique for the calibration of FE formulation and enhances the confidence in the model. The FE diffraction post-processing procedures are discussed in detail, and comparison between the model predictions and experimental data are presented.

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 524-525)

Edited by:

W. Reimers and S. Quander

Pages:

427-432

DOI:

10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.524-525.427

Citation:

D. Dini et al., "Diffraction Post-Processor for Polycrystalline Plasticity Modelling", Materials Science Forum, Vols. 524-525, pp. 427-432, 2006

Online since:

September 2006

Export:

Price:

$35.00

[1] F. Barbe, L. Decker, et al., International Journal of Plasticity, 17 (2001), p.513.

[2] F. Barbe, S. Forest, and G. Cailletaud, International Journal of Plasticity, 17 (2001), p.537.

[3] O. Diard, S. Leclercq, et al., Computational Materials Science, 25 (2002), p.73.

[4] O. Diard, S. Leclereq, et al., International Journal of Plasticity, 21 (2005), p.691.

[5] A. Manonukul and F.P.E. Dunne, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series a- Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences, 460 (2004), p.1881.

[6] L. Anand, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 193 (2004), p.5359.

[7] P.R. Dawson, International Journal of Solids and Structures, 37 (2000), p.115.

[8] G.B. Sarma and P.R. Dawson, Acta Materialia, 44 (1996), p. (1937).

[9] G.B. Sarma and P.R. Dawson, International Journal of Plasticity, 12 (1996), p.1023.

[10] A. Staroselsky and L. Anand, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 46 (1998), p.671.

[11] A. Staroselsky and L. Anand, International Journal of Plasticity, 19 (2003), p.1843.

[12] J.W. Hutchinson, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series a-Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 319 (1970), p.247.

[13] R.A. Lebensohn and C.N. Tome, Acta Metallurgica et Materialia, 41 (1993), p.2611.

[14] N. Zhang and W. Tong, International Journal of Plasticity, 20 (2004), p.523.

[15] B. Clausen, T. Lorentzen, et al., Materials Science and Engineering A, 259 (1999), p.17.

[16] T. Lorentzen, M.R. Daymond, et al., Acta Materialia, 50 (2002), p.1627.

[17] A.M. Korsunsky and K.E. James, Advanced strain analysis by high energy synchrotron X-ray diffraction, in ECRS6: Proc. of 6th European Conference on Residual Stresses. 2002. p.329.

In order to see related information, you need to Login.