Oxford HEXameter: Laboratory High Energy X-Ray Diffractometer for Bulk Residual Stress Analysis


Article Preview

Diffraction of penetrating radiation such as neutrons or high energy X-rays provides a powerful non-destructive method for the evaluation of residual stresses in engineering components. In particular, strain scanning using synchrotron energy-dispersive X-ray diffraction has been shown to offer a fast and highly spatially resolving measurement technique. Synchrotron beamlines provide best available instruments in terms of flux and low beam divergence, and hence spatial and measurement resolution and data collection rate. However, despite the rapidly growing number of facilities becoming available in Europe and across the world, access to synchrotron beamlines for routine industrial and research use remains regulated, comparatively slow and expensive. A laboratory high energy X-ray diffractometer for bulk residual strain evaluation (HEXameter) has been developed and built at Oxford University. It uses a twin-detector setup first proposed by one of the authors in the energy dispersive X-ray diffraction mode and allows simultaneous determination of macroscopic and microscopic strains in two mutually orthogonal directions that lie approximately within the plane normal to the incident beam. A careful procedure for detector response calibration is used in order to facilitate accurate determination of lattice parameters by pattern refinement. The results of HEXameter measurements are compared with synchrotron X-ray data for several samples e.g. made from a titanium alloy and a particulate composite with an aluminium alloy matrix. Experimental results are found to be consistent with synchrotron measurements and strain resolution close to 2×10-4 is routinely achieved by the new instrument.



Materials Science Forum (Volumes 524-525)

Edited by:

W. Reimers and S. Quander




A. M. Korsunsky et al., "Oxford HEXameter: Laboratory High Energy X-Ray Diffractometer for Bulk Residual Stress Analysis", Materials Science Forum, Vols. 524-525, pp. 743-748, 2006

Online since:

September 2006




[1] W. Reimers, M. Broda, G. Brusch, D. Dantz, K.D. Liss, A. Pyzalla, T. Schmackers, T. Tschentscher: J. Non-destr. Eval. 17 (1998) pp.129-140.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1022607030355

[2] A.M. Korsunsky, S.P. Collins, R.A. Owen, M.R. Daymond, S. Achtioui and K.E. James: J. Synchrotron Radiation Vol. 9 (2002), pp.77-81.

[3] H. Ruppersberg and I. Detemple: Materials Science and Engineering A 161 (1993) pp.41-44.

[4] B. Ballard, X. Zhu, and P. Predecki, in Proceedings of ICRS4, edited by P. Gergaud, J. J. Bacmann, and J. L. Lebrun, Society for Experimental Mechanics, Bethel, CT (1994) p.1133.

[5] J. Liu, K. Kim, M. Golshan, D. Laundy and A.M. Korsunsky: J. Applied Crystallography Vol. 38 (2005) pp.661-667.

[6] A.M. Korsunsky Synchrotron Stress Analysis Laboratory (SySAL) - A New Process and Design Optimisation Facility, EPSRC Proposal GR/R69785 (2001).

[7] T. Wroblewski, U. Ponkratz and F. Porsch: Nuclear Instr Meth A 532 (2004) pp.639-643.

[8] M.W. Johnson, L. Edwards, P.J. Withers: Physica B 234 (1997) pp.1141-1143.