Measuring and Predicting the Effects of Residual Stresses on Crack Propagation

Abstract:

Article Preview

This article presents the first part of a study on the interaction between residual stresses and crack driving force. Blunt notched CT specimens were pre-strained to introduce residual stresses at the notch, where a crack is subsequently introduced. FE modelling is used to model the specimen preload and pre-cracking. Modelling predictions are validated by two different methods. The total predicted surface residual strains are compared to image correlation measurements. The predicted residual strains were measured using neutron diffraction, both before and after fatigue cracking. The residual strain profiles show good agreement with the 3D FE model in the far field but the peak strains measured near the notch are smaller those predicted. This is a result of the low spatial resolution of the technique.

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 524-525)

Edited by:

W. Reimers and S. Quander

Pages:

77-82

DOI:

10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.524-525.77

Citation:

A. Shterenlikht et al., "Measuring and Predicting the Effects of Residual Stresses on Crack Propagation ", Materials Science Forum, Vols. 524-525, pp. 77-82, 2006

Online since:

September 2006

Export:

Price:

$35.00

[1] ASTM E1823-05a. Standard terminology relating to fatigue and fracture testing. American Society for Testing and Materials, (2005).

[2] ASTM E1921-05. Standard test method for determination of reference temperature, T0, for ferritic steels in the transition range. American Society for Testing and Materials, (2005).

[3] D. W. Beardsmore. JEDI Guide: Theory of Calculation and A Users Guide. Technical Report CREW 4. 8, SA/EIG/15243001/R001, Serco Assurance, October (2005).

[4] Hibbit, Karlsson and Sorensen, Inc. ABAQUS User Manuals, 6. 4 edition, (2004).

[5] W. F. Clocksin, J. Quinta da Fonseca, P.J. Withers, and P. H. S. Torr. Image processing issues in digital strain mapping. In Proceedings of SPIE, Vol. 4790, pages 384-395, (2002).

DOI: 10.1117/12.452334

[6] M. A. Sutton, S. R. McNeill, J. D. Helm, and Y. J. Chao. Advances in two-dimensional and three-dimensional computer vision. Topics in Applied Physics, 77: 323-372, (1999).

DOI: 10.1007/3-540-48800-6_10

[7] LaVision GmbH. PIV Software Manual: DaVis. Gottingen, Germany, 1999. www. lavision. de.

[8] J.A. Dann, M.R. Daymond, J.A.J. James, J.R. Santisteban, and L. Edwards. ENGIN-X - a new diffractometer optimised for stress measurement. In Proc. ICANS-XVI. D¨usseldorf-Neuss, (2003).

[9] H.M. Rietveld. A profile refinement method for nuclear and magnetic structures. J. Appl. Cryst., 2: 65-71, (1969).

[10] A. C. Larson and R. B. Von Dreele. GSAS - General Structure Analysis System manual. ftp: /ftp. lanl. gov/public/gsas/, (2002).

In order to see related information, you need to Login.