Multi-Scale Simulation of MBE-Grown SiC/Si Nanostructures

Abstract:

Article Preview

The main obstacle for the implementation of numerical simulation for the prediction of the epitaxial growth is the variety of physical processes with considerable differences in time and spatial scales taking place during epitaxy: deposition of atoms, surface and bulk diffusion, nucleation of two-dimensional and three-dimensional clusters, etc. Thus, it is not possible to describe all of them in the framework of a single physical model. In this work there was developed a multi-scale simulation method for molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) of silicon carbide nanostructures on silicon. Three numerical methods were used in a complex: Molecular Dynamics (MD), kinetic Monte Carlo (KMC), and the Rate Equations (RE). MD was used for the estimation of kinetic parameters of atoms at the surface, which are input parameters for other simulation methods. The KMC allowed the atomic-scale simulation of the cluster formation, which is the initial stage of the SiC growth, while the RE method gave the ability to study the growth process on a longer time scale. As a result, a full-scale description of the surface evolution during SiC formation on Si substrates was developed.

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 527-529)

Edited by:

Robert P. Devaty, David J. Larkin and Stephen E. Saddow

Pages:

315-318

Citation:

A. A. Schmidt et al., "Multi-Scale Simulation of MBE-Grown SiC/Si Nanostructures", Materials Science Forum, Vols. 527-529, pp. 315-318, 2006

Online since:

October 2006

Export:

Price:

$38.00

[1] J.B. Casady and R.W. Johnson: Solid-State Electronics, Vol. 39 (1996), p.1409.

[2] U. Kaiser, S.B. Newcomb, W.M. Stobbs, M. Adamik, A. Fissel and W. Lichter: J. Mater. Res. Vol. 13 (1998), p.3571.

[3] V. Cimalla, Th. Stauden, G. Ecke, F. Scharmann, G. Eichhorn, S. Sloboshanin, J.A. Schaefer and J. Pezoldt: Appl. Phys. Lett. Vol. 73 (1999), p.3542.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.122801

[4] F. Scharmann, P. Malarski, W. Attenberger, J.K.N. Linder, B. Strizker, Th. Stauden and J. Pezoldt: Thin Solid Films Vol. 380 (2000), p.92.

[5] J. Tersoff: Phys. Rev. B Vol. 39 (1989), p.5566.

[6] E.E. Zhurkin and M. Hou: J. Phys.: Condensed Matter Vol. 12 (2000), p.6735.

[7] V.S. Kharlamov, E.E. Zhurkin and M. Hou: Nucl. Inst. and Meth. Vol. B193 (2002), p.538.

[8] E. Schoell and S. Bose: Solid-State. Electronics Vol. 42 (1998), p.1587.

[9] A.A. Schmidt, V.S. Kharlamov, K.L. Safonov, Yu.V. Trushin, E.E. Zhurkin, V. Cimalla, O. Ambacher and J. Pezoldt: Comp. Mater. Sci. Vol. 33 (2005), p.375.

[10] K.L. Safonov, D.V. Kulikov, Yu.V. Trushin and J. Pezoldt: Proc. of SPIE Vol. 4627 (2002), p.165.

[11] K.L. Safonov, Yu.V. Trushin and J. Pezoldt: Proc. of 7th Int. Moscow School of Physics, to be published.

[12] K.L. Safonov, D.V. Kulikov, Yu.V. Trushin and J. Pezoldt: Proc. of SPIE, Vol. 5127 (2003), p.128.

[13] Y. Shigeta, H. Fujino, and K. Maki: J. Appl. Phys. Vol. 86 (1999), p.881.

[14] H. Brune, M. Giovannini, K. Bromann and K. Kern: Nature, Vol. 394, (1998), p.451.

[15] V. Cimalla, A.A. Schmidt, Th. Stauden, K. Zekentes, O. Ambacher and J. Pezoldt: J. Vac. Sci. Technol. Vol. B22 (2004), p. L20.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1116/1.1787520

Fetching data from Crossref.
This may take some time to load.