Micro Structural Aspects of Unstable Crack Propagation in Ferritic Steels

Abstract:

Article Preview

Fracture of ferritic reactor pressure vessel steels is determined by temperature and specimen size. In low temperature fracture occurs by cleavage, with elevation of temperature and decrease of specimen size the ratio of ductile tearing prior to cleavage increases and, in the end, fracture will have a ductile character. There is a temperature interval where both fracture mechanisms are present. Hypothesis of the traditional (global) assessment method has been that the shift of the fracture toughness reference curves due to neutron irradiation is equal with the shift of the ductile-to-brittle transition temperature measured by the Charpy impact test. Local assessment approaches based on the „weakest link” statistical theory recommend the direct measurement of fracture mechanics parameters to structural integrity evaluation. The paper describes the main features of both global and local approaches, analyzing the micro structural aspects of the most known micromechanical models of local approach and drawing conclusions concerning their applicability.

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 537-538)

Edited by:

J. Gyulai and P.J. Szabó

Pages:

465-472

Citation:

P. Trampus "Micro Structural Aspects of Unstable Crack Propagation in Ferritic Steels", Materials Science Forum, Vols. 537-538, pp. 465-472, 2007

Online since:

February 2007

Authors:

Export:

Price:

$38.00

[1] Euro Fracture Toughness Data Base. Project No. MAT-CT-940080.

[2] ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section III: Nuclear Power Plant Components, New York, (1995).

[3] RCC-M, Design and construction rules for mechanical components of PWR nuclear power plants, EdF and Framatome, (2000).

[4] KTA 3201. 2 Komponenten des Primärkreises von Leichtwasserreaktoren. Konstruktion und Berechnung, (1996).

[5] PNAE G-7-002-86: Strength Calculations for Components and Pipelines of Nuclear Power Installations (in Russian), Energoatomizdat, Moscow, (1990).

[6] Brumovsky M: Check of Master Curve application to embrittled RPVs of WWER type reactors. Int. J. Pressure Vessels and Piping, 79. 2002. pp.715-721.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0308-0161(02)00074-1

[7] Regulatory Guideline 3. 17 (draft): PTS Assessment of Reactor Pressure Vessel (in Hungarian). OAH, Budapest, (2005).

[8] Ritchie R O, Knott J F and Rice J R: On the relationship between critical tensile stress and fracture toughness in mild steel. J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 21, 1973. pp.395-410.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2172/4442244

[9] Beremin F M: A local criterion for cleavage fracture of nuclear pressure vessel steel. Metallurgical Transactions, 14A, 1983. pp.2277-2287.

[10] Wallin K, Saario T and Törrönen K: Statistical model for carbide induced brittle fracture in steel. Metal Science, 18, 1984. pp.13-16.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/030634584790420384

[11] Lin T, Evans A G and Ritchie R O: Statistical model of brittle fracture by transgranular cleavage. J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 34, 1986. pp.477-496.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(86)90013-x

[12] Mudry F: A local approach to cleavage fracture. Nucl. Eng. Design, 105, 1987. p.6576.

[13] Anderson T L, Stienstra D and Dodds R H Jr: A Theoretical Framework for Addressing Fracture in the Ductile-Brittle Transition Region. In: Landes J D, McCabe D E and Boulet J A M (eds) Fracture Mechanics: Twenty-Fourth Volume, ASTM STP 1207, Philadelphia, 1994. pp.186-214.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1520/stp13706s

[14] Balleteros A, Bros J and Brumovsky M: Applications of the Master Curve Approach to Irradiated Steels. In: Proc. 12th Int. Conf. Nucl. Engineering, Arlington, Virginia USA, 2004, ICONE12-49391.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/icone12-49391

[15] Guidelines for Application of the Master Curve Approach to Reactor Pressure Vessel Integrity in Nuclear Power Plants. TRS No. 429, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, (2005).

[16] Zhang X Z, Knott J F: Review and perspective on approaches of evaluating cleavage fracture toughness of pressure vessel steels. In: Proc. 12th Int. Conf. Nucl. Engineering, Arlington, Virginia USA, 2004, ICONE12-49053.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/icone12-49053

[17] Zhang X Z, Knott J F: The Statistical Modelling of Brittle Fracture in Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Steel Microstructures. Acta mater. 48, 2000. pp.2135-2146.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s1359-6454(00)00055-0

[18] Ortner S: Factors affecting the shape of the ductile-to-brittle transition. Int. J. Pressure Vessels and Piping, 79, 2002. pp.693-700.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0308-0161(02)00072-8

[19] Margolin B Z et al: An engineering method for prediction of the fracture toughness temperature dependence for RPV steels. Int. J. Pressure Vessels and Piping, 80, 2003. pp.817-829.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2003.12.005

[20] RD EO 0353-02: Methodology for Determination of RPV Service Life of VVER Reactors (in Russian), St. Petersburg-Moscow, (2000).

[21] VERLIFE Unified procedure for lifetime assessment of components and piping in WWER NPPs. EC 5th FP, (2003).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/pvp2008-61473

Fetching data from Crossref.
This may take some time to load.