Different Processing Methods to Obtain Porous Structure in Shape Memory Polymers

Abstract:

Article Preview

In the last few years, clinical procedures undergone huge modifications. Among them, mini-invasive surgery has modified the clinical practice and the quality of life of patients. Shape Memory Polymers (SMPs), a class of stimuli-responsive materials, can be considered ideal candidates for the design of devices for mini-invasive surgical procedures. Such a device can be inserted in a packed in, temporary shape and later can expand at body temperature. A bone defect could be filled by a SMP porous structure, that improves the tissue integration and healing. In this work, two different processing techniques to obtain porous shape memory polymer scaffolds from Calo MER™ and MM-4520, two SMPs, are presented. Porous structures were obtained by micro-extrusion with different chemical foaming agents or with sodium chloride, or by solvent casting/particulate leaching. The morphology, the thermo-mechanical and the shape recovery properties of the SMP porous samples were investigated. Tridimensional porous structures showed a well interconnected morphology, with a pore size in the range aimed for bone interaction applications. The shape memory properties were not significantly affected by the transformation processes: a good ability of recovering the original shape was verified. Therefore, the porous structures, obtained from these SMP materials, appear adequate for an use as bone filler.

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 539-543)

Main Theme:

Edited by:

T. Chandra, K. Tsuzaki, M. Militzer , C. Ravindran

Pages:

663-668

Citation:

S. Farè et al., "Different Processing Methods to Obtain Porous Structure in Shape Memory Polymers", Materials Science Forum, Vols. 539-543, pp. 663-668, 2007

Online since:

March 2007

Export:

Price:

$38.00

[1] F. Li, X. Zhang, J. Hou, M. Xu, X. Luo, D. Ma, and B.K. Kim, J Appl Polymer Science 64 (1997), p.1511.

[2] AA. VV., Shape Memory Implants, L'H. Yahia, ed., Springer-Verlag (2000).

[3] Lendlein and R. Langer, Science 296 (2002), p.1673.

[4] A. Metcalfe, A.C. Desfaits, Y. Salazkin, L'H. Yahia, W.M. Sokolowski and J. Raymond, Biomaterials 24 (2003), p.491.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00560-4

[5] B.K. Kim, S.Y. Lee and M. Xu, Polymers 37 (1996), p.5781.

[6] S. Farè, M. Danielli, V. Valtulina, L. deNardo, L. Draghi, L. Visai, P. Speziale, and M.C. Tanzi, Journal of Applied Biomaterials & Biomechanics 2 (2004), 210.

[7] S. Farè, G. Pietrocola, P. Petrini, E. Alessandrini, M.C. Tanzi, P. Speziale and L. Visai, J Biomed Mater Res 73A (2005), p.1.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.30193

[8] Z.G. Thang, S.H. Teoth, W. McFarlane, L.A. Poole-Warren and M. Umezu, Materials Science Engineering C20 (2002), p.149.

[9] W.L. Murphy, D.H. Kohn and D.J. Mooney, J Biomed Mater Res 50 (2000), p.50.

[10] K.A. White and R.S. Ward, Trans 28 th Annual Meeting of the Society for Biomaterials (2002, Tampa, FL, USA): 671.

[11] ASTM E1640, Standard Test Method for Assignment of the Glass Transition Temperature By Dynamic Mechanical Analysis (1999).

Fetching data from Crossref.
This may take some time to load.