Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Low Pressure Die Cast AM50 Magnesium Alloy

Abstract:

Article Preview

Compact AM50 alloy components were cast by Low Pressure Die Casting (LPDC) process. The microstructure and mechanical properties of cast components were investigated under as-cast and heat treated states. It was found that the microstructure of LPDC AM50 is composed of α-Mg and second phases - Mg17Al12 and Al8Mn5. Compared with Gravity die casting, LPDC AM50 alloy had much coarser grains and higher density, with smaller sizes and less content of second phases. The density of AM50 alloy by LPDC process was ρ=1.7836g/cm3, with increase of 0.45% based on Gravity die casting and much more increase compared with high pressure die casting. The as-cast mechanical properties by LPDC process were: σ0.2=57.8Mpa, σb=192.3Mpa, δ=8.7%. These of Gravity die casting were: σ0.2=53Mpa, σb=173.4Mpa, δ=8.1%. UTS in LPDC increased about 20MPa, with better YTS and Elongation. Compared with that of high pressure die cast AM50, the YTS of LPDC was much lower, with comparable UTS and Elongation. The mechanical properties of the heat treated AM50 alloy were still in the same level of as-cast state. AM50 alloy by LPDC process is not necessary subjected to tempering treatment.

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 546-549)

Edited by:

Yafang Han et al.

Pages:

167-170

DOI:

10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.546-549.167

Citation:

L. M. Peng et al., "Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Low Pressure Die Cast AM50 Magnesium Alloy", Materials Science Forum, Vols. 546-549, pp. 167-170, 2007

Online since:

May 2007

Export:

Price:

$35.00

[1] B.L. Mordike, T. Ebert: Mat. Sci. Eng. A, 302 (2001), pp.37-45.

[2] I.M. Baghni, Wu Yin-shun, Li Jiu-qing, et al.: Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China, 2003 13 (6), pp.1253-1259.

[3] Chadha Gurjeev, Allison John E., Jones J. Wayne, in: Alan A. Luo (Eds. ), Magnesium Technology 2004, TMS, 2004, pp.181-186.

[4] Donlon W.T., Paige C., Morris C.J., Allison J.E., in: Proceedings of the TMS Materials Week'95 Symposium, Cleveland, OH, USA, Oct 29-Nov 2, (1995).

[5] Mark Easton, Trevor Abbott, Carlos Caceres: Materials Science Forum, 2003(419-422), pp.147-152.

[6] R. M. Wang, A. Eliezer, E. M. Gutman: Mat. Sci. Eng. A, 2003(355), pp.201-207.

[7] H. Westengen, O. Holta: Foundry Trade Journal, 1989 (10), pp.738-742.

[8] Gertsman Val Y., Li Jian, Xu Su, et al.: Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 2005(36), p.1989-(1997).

[9] Hongtao Gao, Guohua Wu, Wenjiang Ding, et al: Journal of Materials Science, 39(2004), pp.6449-6456.

[10] Nahed A., Mohamed A., Engenius Pokora, Friedrich Klein: Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 73(1998), pp.125-138.

[11] L. ˇC´ıˇzeka, M. Gregera, L. Pawlicaa, et al.: Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 157-158 (2004), pp.466-471.

In order to see related information, you need to Login.