Influence of Mg and B Stoichiometry on the Formation Behavior of MgB2 Phase

Abstract:

Article Preview

Bulk samples with the stoichiometry of Mg:B=1:2 and 1:4 were prepared by solid state reaction method. The microstructure and constituent of the samples were investigated by using the scanning electron microscope (SEM) and the x-ray diffraction (XRD). XRD results showed that the MgB2 phase was first formed in all the samples with different stoichiometry of Mg and B, which indicated that the MgB2 was the most thermodynamically stable phase in the Mg-B binary system. For the samples of Mg:B=1:2, the MgB2 single phase was formed very well when these samples were sintered at 650°C~700°C. For the samples with later added Mg reaching to the stoichiometry of Mg:B=1:2, a longer reaction time or higher reaction temperature was required for the formation of the MgB2 single phase. The SEM results showed that the samples with later added Mg had dense microstructures, suggesting that the later addition of Mg could reduce the porosity of the sample. A small increase of the superconducting transition temperature, Tc, in the Mg addition sample resulted from the dense microstructures.

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 546-549)

Edited by:

Yafang Han et al.

Pages:

2035-2039

Citation:

S.C. Yan et al., "Influence of Mg and B Stoichiometry on the Formation Behavior of MgB2 Phase", Materials Science Forum, Vols. 546-549, pp. 2035-2039, 2007

Online since:

May 2007

Export:

Price:

$38.00

[1] Nagamatsu. J, Nakagawa. N, Zenitani. Y, Akimitsu. J, Nature 410 (2001) 63.

[2] Z. K. Liu, D. G. Schlom, Q. Li, X. X. Xi, Applied Physics Letters 78 (2001) 3678.

[3] Qing-rong Feng, Xin Wang, Xin-Yie Wang, Guang-cheng Xiong, Solid State Communications 122 (2002) 459.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0038-1098(02)00165-5

[4] Chinping Chen, Zeng-jun Zhou, Xing-guo Li, Jun Xu, Yu-hao Wang, Zheng-xiang Gao, Qing-rong Feng, Solid State Communications 131 (2004) 275.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssc.2004.03.058

[5] Qing-rong Feng, Chinping Chen, Jun Xu, Ling-wen Kong, Xin Chen, Yong-zhong Wang, Yan Zhang, Zheng-xiang Gao, Physica C 411 (2004) 41.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physc.2004.05.016

[6] Qing-rong Feng, Xun Chen, Yu-hao Wang, Xin Wang, Guang-cheng Xiong, Zheng-xiang Gao, Physica C 386 (2003) 653.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0921-4534(02)02184-6

[7] Y. G. Zhao, X. P. Zhang, P. T. Qiao, H. T. Zhang, S. L. Jia, B. S. Cao, M. H. Zhu, Z. H. Han, X. L. Wang, B. L. Gu. Physica C 366 (2001) 1.

[8] H. L. Xu, Y. Feng, Z. Xu, C. S. Li, G. Yan, E. Mossang, A. Sulpice, Physica C 419 (2005) 94.

[9] A. Yamamoto, J. Shimoyama, S. Ueda, Y. Katsura, S. Horii, K. Kishio, Superconductor Science and Technology 18 (2005) 116.

Fetching data from Crossref.
This may take some time to load.