A Comparative Study of Surface Passivation on SiC BJTs with High Current Gain

Abstract:

Article Preview

The effect of the different types of passivation layers on the current gain of SiC BJTs has been investigated. Measurements have been compared for BJTs passivated with thermal SiO2, plasma deposited (PECVD) SiO2 and BJTs without passivation. The maximum DC current gain of BJTs with thermal SiO2 was about 62 at IC=20 mA and Vce=40 V. On the other hand, the BJTs with a passivation by PECVD SiO2 had a DC current gain of only 25. The surface recombination current was extracted from measurements with BJTs of different emitter widths. The surface recombination current of BJTs with a thermally grown oxide was about 25 % lower than unpassivated BJTs and 65 % lower than that of PECVD passivated BJTs.

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 556-557)

Edited by:

N. Wright, C.M. Johnson, K. Vassilevski, I. Nikitina and A. Horsfall

Pages:

631-634

Citation:

H. S. Lee et al., "A Comparative Study of Surface Passivation on SiC BJTs with High Current Gain", Materials Science Forum, Vols. 556-557, pp. 631-634, 2007

Online since:

September 2007

Export:

Price:

$38.00

[1] C. -M. Zetterling: Processing Technology for Silicon Carbide devices, (EMIS Processing Series, INSPEC, IEE, London, UK, 2002) ISBN 0 85296 998 8.

[2] Y. Tang et al.: Mat. Sci. Forum Vol. 389-393 (2002), p.1329.

[3] S. Krishnaswami et al.: IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. Vol. 26 (2005), p.175.

[4] M. Domeij et al.: IEEE Electron Device Lett. Vol. 26 (2005), p.743.

[5] A. Galeckas et al.: Appl. Phys. Lett. Vol. 79 (2001), p.365.

[6] N. Hayama et al.: IEEE Electron Device Lett. Vol. 11 (1990), p.388.

[7] W. Liu et al.: IEEE Electron Dev. Vol. 39 (1992), p.2726.

[8] H. Ö. Ólafsson: Ph. D thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden (2004).

Fetching data from Crossref.
This may take some time to load.