Understanding Dynamic Recrystallization Behavior through a Delay Differential Equation Approach


Article Preview

During hot working, deformation of metals such as copper or austenitic steels involves features of both diffusional flow and dislocation motion. As such, the true stress-true strain relationship depends on the strain rate. At low strain rates (or high temperatures), the stress-strain curve displays an oscillatory behavior with multiple peaks. As the strain rate increases (or as the temperature is reduced), the number of peaks on the stress-strain curve decreases, and at high strain rates, the stress rises to a single peak before settling at a steady-state value. It is understood that dynamic recovery is responsible for the stress-strain behavior with zero or a single peak, whereas dynamic recrystallization causes the oscillatory nature. In the past, most predictive models are based on either modified Johnson-Mehl-Avrami kinetic equations or probabilistic approaches. In this work, a delay differential equation is utilized for modeling such a stress-strain behavior. The approach takes into account for a delay time due to diffusion, which is expressed as the critical strain for nucleation for recrystallization. The solution shows that the oscillatory nature depends on the ratio of the critical strain for nucleation to the critical strain for completion for recrystallization. As the strain ratio increases, the stress-strain curve changes from a monotonic rise to a single peak, then to a multiple peak behavior. The model also predicts transient flow curves resulting from strain rate changes.



Materials Science Forum (Volumes 558-559)

Edited by:

S.-J.L. Kang, M.Y. Huh, N.M. Hwang, H. Homma, K. Ushioda and Y. Ikuhara




J. K. Lee, "Understanding Dynamic Recrystallization Behavior through a Delay Differential Equation Approach", Materials Science Forum, Vols. 558-559, pp. 441-448, 2007

Online since:

October 2007





[1] M. J. Luton and C. M. Sellars: Acta Metall., Vol. 17, (1969), p.1033.

[2] R. Sandstrom and R. Lagneborg: Acta Metall., Vol. 23, (1975), p.387.

[3] A. D. Rollet, M. J. Luton, and D. J. Srolovitz, Acta Metall. Mater., Vol. 40, (1992), p.43.

[4] P. Peczak and M. J. Luton: Phil. Mag. B., Vol. 70, (1994), p.817.

[5] R. L. Goetz and V. Seetharaman: Scripta Mater., Vol. 38, (1998), p.405.

[6] R. Ding and Z. X. Guo: Acta Mater., Vol. 49, (2001), p.3163.

[7] V. G. Garcia, J. M. Cabrera and J. M. Prado: Mater. Sci. Forum, Vol. 467-470, (2004), p.1181.

[8] V. G. Garcia: Ph.D. thesis (2004), Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya, http: /www. tdx. cesca. es/ TDX-0104105-09244.

[9] U. F. Kocks: Trans. ASME J. Eng. Mater. Technol., Vol. 98, (1976), p.76.

[10] I. R. Epstein: J. Chem. Phys., Vol. 92, (1990), p.1702.

[11] N. E. Dowling: Mechanical Behavior of Materials, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey (1993).

[12] H. J. McQueen and J. J. Jonas, in: Treatise in Materials Science and Technology, Volume 6: Plastic Deformation of Materials, edited by R. J. Arsenault, Academic Press, New York, NY (1975).

[13] C. Rossard: Metaux Vol. 35, (1960), p.102, p.140 and p.190.

[14] T. Sakai, M. G. Akben and J. J. Jonas: Acta Metall., Vol. 31 (1983), p.631.

[15] H. I. Aaronson and J. K. Lee, in: Lectures on the Theory of Phase Transformations, 2nd Ed., edited by H. I. Aaronson, TMS, Warrendale, PA (1999).

[16] P. Shewmon: Diffusion in Solids, 2nd Ed., TMS, Warrendale, PA (1989).

[17] J. K. Lee, F. R. Ehrlich, L. A. Crall, and T. H. Collins: Metall. Trans., Vol. 19A, (1988), p.329.

[18] Y. J. Li, R. Valiev, and W. Blum: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, Vol. 410-411, (2005), p.451.

[19] R. L. Ketter and S. P. Prawel, Jr.: Modern Methods of Engineering Computation, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY (1969). ε ˙.