Investigation of Deformation Gradients in Surface Zone of Mechanically Surface Treated CuZn30


Article Preview

The deformation degrees in near-surface zones and related microstructural changes in CuZn30 were determined after shot peening and ball-burnishing. The induced depths of plastic deformation increase with Almen intensity and rolling pressure in shot peening and ball-burnishing, respectively. As the ball size in burnishing increases, the depth of plastic deformation also increases. The local degrees of cold work within the affected depths were estimated by comparing micro-hardness values, penetration depths of induced slip bands as well as X-ray diffraction peak widths with those measured in blanks cold rolled to fixed degrees of plastic strain. The results clearly indicate that very high local deformation degrees above 80% are typically induced by mechanical surface treatments in areas very close to the surface with this deformation degree gradually decreasing with increasing distance to the surface. Depending on the intensity of ball-burnishing, deformation degrees still of the order of 10% were observed in regions having distances to the surface of as large as 1000 (m.



Materials Science Forum (Volumes 561-565)

Main Theme:

Edited by:

Young Won Chang, Nack J. Kim and Chong Soo Lee




S. B. Yi et al., "Investigation of Deformation Gradients in Surface Zone of Mechanically Surface Treated CuZn30", Materials Science Forum, Vols. 561-565, pp. 2229-2232, 2007

Online since:

October 2007




[1] V. Schulze: Modern mechanical surface treatment; states, stability, effects (Wiley-VCH, 2006).

[2] I. Altenberger in: Shot Peening and Other Mechanical Surface Treatments (V. Schulze and A. Niku Lari, eds. ) (2005), 144-155.

[3] A.M. Hassan: J. Mater. Processing Tech. Vol. 72 (1997), 385-391.

[4] A.M. Hassan, H.F. Al-Jalil, A.A. Ebied: J. Mater. Processing Tech. Vol. 83 (1998), 176-179.

[5] P.S. Prevey, J.T. Cammett in: Shot Peening (L. Wagner, ed. ) Wiley-VCH (2002) 295-304.

[6] J. Lindemann, K. Grossmann, T. Raczek, L. Wagner in: Shot Peening (L. Wagner, ed. ) WileyVCH (2002) 454-460.


[7] L. Wagner: Mater. Sci. Eng. Vol. A263 (1999), 210-216.

0 0. 5 1. 0 1. 5 2. 0 2. 5.




[1] 0.

[1] 2.

[1] 4.

[1] 6.

[1] 8 FWHM {311} (°) CR degree (εεεε) 50bar.


63mmN 250bar Fig. 5 Comparison of measured maximum values in microhardness (a) and FWHM of {311} diffraction peaks (b) after SP and BB with those in CR material. (ε = ln (t0 / t), where, t0 = initial thickness, t = actual thickness) CR BB with 3mm BB with 6mm SP.

0 0. 5 1. 0 1. 5 2. 0 2. 5 100 150 200 250 Microhardness (HV 0. 01) CR degree (εεεε) 50bar.

22mmN 50bar 400bar.

63mmN 400bar CR BB with 3mm BB with 6mm SP (a) Microhardness vs. CR degree (b) FWHM vs. CR degree.