The Influence of Thermal Sprayed Coats Chemical Composition on the Microstructure and Properties


Article Preview

In the present work, the microstructure, phase composition and microhardness of Cr3C2-NiCr, WCCo, and powdered composite NiCrSiBCr10%,Fe2.5%,Si3.1%,Bi2.1%C; NiCrSiBFe5; NiCrSiBCr5; NiCrSiBFe2.5Cr2.5; HVOF coatings applied on the Al-Si substrate have been compared. The coating cross-sections were examined by optical microscopy (OM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and electron transmission microscopy (TEM). For hard Cr3C2-NiCr and WC-Co coatings, a total microhardness level of about 860 and 1240 HV, respectively, was obtained. The microhardness of composite coatings was essentially lower and comprised in the range of values between 420 and 540 HV. The lowest level of microhardness showed the NiCrSiBFe2.5Cr2.5 coating. The most refined microstructure was found in Cr3C2 and WC coatings. The mean size of splat granules obtained in Cr3C2-NiCr had the value of about 2.7 m and of 0.5 m in WC-Co. For comparison, the granules obtained in composite coatings had the dimensions of about 30 μm. An Xray diffraction (XRD) revealed the presence of Cr3C2 and WC carbides in Cr3C2-CrNi and WC-Co coatings. In composite coatings, the phases of Cr3Ni5Si2, Ni3Si, FeSi, Fe2B, Cr3Si, BCr as well as other phases were found. The existence of the analyzed phases was additionally confirmed by the selective etching of coating microstructure. The annealing of coatings at 823K resulted in pore disappearance and increased the coating microhardness.



Edited by:

Maria Richert




M. Książek et al., "The Influence of Thermal Sprayed Coats Chemical Composition on the Microstructure and Properties", Materials Science Forum, Vol. 674, pp. 113-120, 2011

Online since:

February 2011




[1] A.K. Maiti, N. Mukhopadhyay, R. Raman: Surf. Coat. Technology Vol. 201 (2007), p.7781.

[2] C.J. Li, Y. Wang, G. -C. Ji, A. Ohmori: Thermal Spray 2003: Advancing the Science and Applying the Technology, edited by C. Moreau and B. Marple, Published by ASM International Materials Park, Ohio USA (2003).

[3] B. Rajasekaran, G. Mauer, R. Vasen, A. Rottger, S. Weber, W. Theisen: Surf. Coat. Technology Vol. 204 (2010), p.3853.

[4] C.T. Kunioshi, O.V. Correa, L.V. Ramanathan: Mater. Research Vol. 8 (2005), p.125.

[5] J.K.N. Murthy, K.S. Prasad, K. Gopinath, B. Venkataraman: Surf. Coat. Technology Vol. 204 (2010), p.3975.

[6] L. Pawłowski: Surf. Coat. Technology Vol. 203 (2009), p.2807.

[7] C. -J. Li, Y. -Y. Wang, G. -J. Yang, A. Ohmori, K.A. Khor: Mater. Sci. Technology Vol. 20 (2004), p.1087.

[8] Y.Y. Wang, C-J. Li, A. Ohmori: Surf. Coat. Technology Vol. 200 (2006), p.2923.

[9] E. Fluert, Y. -C. Kim, J. -S. Kim, D. -H. Kim, W.T. Kim, H. -S. Ahn, S. -M. Lee: J. Alloys & Compounds Vol. 342 (2002), p.321.

[10] J.A. Picas, A. Forn, A. Igartua, G. Mendoza: Surf. Coat. Technology Vol. 174-175 (2003), p.1095.

[11] Gang-Chang Ji, Chang-Jiu Li, Y-Yue Wang, Wen-Ya Li: Surf. Coat. Technology Vol. 200 (2006), p.6749.

[12] B.V. Krishna, V.N. Misra, P.S. Mukherjee, P. Sharma: J. Refrac. Metals & Hard Materials Vol. 20 (2002), p.355.

[13] M. Factor, I. Roman: Surf. Coat. Technology Vol. 132 (2000), p.65.

[14] G. Bolelli, L. Lusvarghi, M. Barletta: Wear Vol. 267 (2009), p.944.

[15] B. Gerard: Surf. Coat. Technology Vol. 201 (2006), p. (2028).

Fetching data from Crossref.
This may take some time to load.