Measuring in-depth Residual Stress Gradients: The Challenge of Induction Hardened Parts

Abstract:

Article Preview

Highly stressed machine parts such as gears and shafts are often surface treated to increase wear and fatigue resistance at critical locations. For example, induction surface hardening (ISH) is increasingly used in the automotive and aerospace industries thanks to the availability of modern multiple frequencies generators and complex shaped coils that provide a great flexibility in process control. With similar end-results in terms of hardened depths, very different residual stress profiles may be obtained, and optimized by modifying both heating and quenching kinetics. If hardness and microstructures variations are routinely verified, some challenges raise for the measurement of the residual stress gradients within complex geometry parts, in particular for the case of deep hardened layers. The most commonly used technique is X-ray diffraction (XRD). It requires using successive layer removal to get access to in-depth stresses. The measurements must therefore be corrected for the stress redistribution occurring during layer removal. However, industrial geometries are often not covered by traditional correction methods. The present work aims at applying XRD to precisely measure in-depth residual stress profiles in induction hardened thin discs made of martensitic steel. Both issues of microstructural variations and redistribution of stresses during layer removal are tackled. First, X-ray elastic constants were determined experimentally using a miniature custom-made tensile machine with specimens heat treated to simulate different microstructures found in ISH parts. Second, a recently introduced finite elements based layer removal correction method was applied. The proposed methodology is used to show the impact of preheating and core hardness on the residual stresses obtained after induction hardening.

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 768-769)

Edited by:

S.J.B. Kurz, E.J. Mittemeijer and B. Scholtes

Pages:

158-165

DOI:

10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.768-769.158

Citation:

V. Savaria et al., "Measuring in-depth Residual Stress Gradients: The Challenge of Induction Hardened Parts", Materials Science Forum, Vols. 768-769, pp. 158-165, 2014

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

$38.00

[1] M. Benedetti, V. Fontanari, B.R. Hohn, P. Oster, T. Tobie, Influence of shot peening on bending tooth fatigue limit of case hardened gears, Int. J. of Fatigue. 24 no 11 (2002) 1127-1136.

DOI: 10.1016/s0142-1123(02)00034-8

[2] H. Guechichi, L. Castex, Fatigue limits prediction of surface treated materials. J. of Mat. Proces. Technol. 172 no 3 (2006) 381-387.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.10.010

[3] J. Grum, Overview of residual stresses after induction surface hardening, Int. J. of Mater. And Prod. Technol. 29 no 1-4 (2007) 9-42.

[4] P.S. Prevéy, X-ray diffraction residual stress techniques, in: G.M. Crankovic (Ed. ), Metals Handbook 10, ASM International, Metals Park, 1986, pp.380-392.

[5] C.L.A. Ricardo, M. D'Incau, P. Scardi, Revision and extension of the standard laboratory technique for X-ray diffraction measurement of residual stress gradients, J. of Appl. Crystallogr. 40 (2007) 675-83.

DOI: 10.1107/s0021889807022935

[6] M.G. Moore, W.P. Evans, Mathematical correction for stress in removed layers in X-ray diffraction residual stress analysis, SAE Transac. 66 (1958) 340-345.

DOI: 10.4271/580035

[7] V. Savaria, F. Bridier, P. Bocher, Computational quantification and correction of the errors induced by layer removal for subsurface residual stress measurements, Int. J. of Mech. Sci. 64 no 1 (2012) 184-195.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2012.07.003

[8] V. Rudnev, D. Loveless, R. Cook, M. Black, Handbook of induction heating, first ed., Marcel Dekker, New York, (2003).

[9] K.D. Clarke, C.J. Van Tyne, C.J. Vigil, R. E. Hackenberg, Induction hardening 5150 steel: Effects of initial microstructure and heating rate, J. of Mater. Eng. and Perform. 20 (2011) 161-168.

DOI: 10.1007/s11665-010-9825-8

[10] Residual stress measurement by X-ray diffraction - HS-784, first ed., SAE International, Warrendale, (2003).

[11] S. Farrell, L. MacGregor, Residual stress analysis of Q1N submarine pressure hull steel with the portable miniature X-Ray diffractometer - report TM 2007-335, DRDC Atlantic, Dartmouth, (2008).

[12] S. Denis, Prévision des contraintes résiduelles induites par traitement thermique et thermochimique, La Revue de Métallurgie. February (1997) 157-176 (in French).

DOI: 10.1051/metal/199794020157

In order to see related information, you need to Login.