Cyclic Voltammetric Study of the Pitting Corrosion Behavior of Low-Nickel Austenitic Stainless Steels in Citric Acid

Abstract:

Article Preview

The pitting corrosion behavior of AISI 202 stainless steel (SS) – a low-nickel, austenitic SS grade, was investigated by means of cyclic voltammetry (CV) technique complemented by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). From the starting potential, the current density decreases and changes its sign at the corrosion potential (Ecorr). The anodic response exhibits a well-defined anodic peak followed by a passive region. A noticeable increase in the anodic current density was observed after reaching the breakdown potential (Eb). The second anodic peak which may be attributed to onset of oxygen evolution was also observed. Moreover, the cyclic voltammograms revealed that hysteresis loop is absent for all the studied concentrations, indicating that AISI 202 SS in citric acid is highly resistant to pitting corrosion as also supported by the results of SEM. It was found out that the critical current density (icrit) increases with increasing citric acid concentration.

Info:

Periodical:

Edited by:

Zhihua Guo, C. W. Lim, Kyoung Sun Moon, George C. Manos

Pages:

191-195

Citation:

F. M. Mulimbayan and M. G. Mena, "Cyclic Voltammetric Study of the Pitting Corrosion Behavior of Low-Nickel Austenitic Stainless Steels in Citric Acid", Materials Science Forum, Vol. 866, pp. 191-195, 2016

Online since:

August 2016

Export:

Price:

$38.00

* - Corresponding Author

[1] P.A. Schweitzer, Corrosion Engineering Handbook, USA: Marcel Dekker, Inc., (1996).

[2] E.M.B. Borgonia, Determination of Chloride Threshold for Corrosion of Reinforcing Steel Bars in Simulated Pore Solution using Potentiodynamic Techniques, UP-Diliman, (2009).

[3] M.G. Fontana, Corrosion Engineering, 3rd ed., Singapore: McGraw-Hill Book Co., (1987) 4.

[4] P.R. Roberge, Handbook of Corrosion Engineering, USA: McGraw-Hill Co., Inc. (2000).

[5] A. Bautista, G. Blanco, F. Velaco, A. Gutierrez, L. Soriano, F.J. Palomares and H. Takenouti, Corrosion Behaviour of Low-nickel Austenitic Stainless Steels Reinforcements: A Comparative Study in Simulated Pore Solutions, Cement and Concrete Research, 36 (2006).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2005.10.009

[6] P.R. Roberge, Corrosion Engineering: Principles and Practice, USA: McGraw-Hill Co., Inc. (2008).

[7] ASTM, Standard Test Method for Conducting Cyclic Potentiodynamic Polarization Measurements for Localized Corrosion Susceptibility of Iron-, Nickel-, or Cobalt-Based Alloys, G-61 (1996).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1520/g0061-86r14

[8] G. Trettenhahn and A. Köberl, Anodic Decomposition of Citric Acid on Gold and Stainless Steel Electrodes: An in situ-FTIR-Spectroscopic Investigation, Electrochimica Acta, 52 (2007) 2716-2722.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2006.09.028

[9] ASTM, Conducting Potentiodynamic Polarization Resistance Measurements, 3, G-59 (2004).

[10] M.A. Deyab and S.T. Keera, Cyclic voltammetric studies of carbon steel corrosion in chloride-formation water solution and effect of some inorganic salts, Eqyptian Journal of Petroleum, 21 (2012) 31-36.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpe.2012.02.005