Direct Observation of Stress Relaxation Process in 4H-SiC Homoepitaxial Layers via In Situ Synchrotron X-Ray Topography


Article Preview

During 4H silicon carbide (4H-SiC) homoepitaxy and post-growth processes, the development of stress relaxation has been observed, in which interfacial dislocations (IDs) are formed at the epilayer/substrate interface, relaxing the misfit strain induced by the nitrogen doping concentration difference between the epilayer and substrate. It is widely believed that an interfacial dislocation is created by the glide of a mobile segment of a basal plane dislocation (BPD) in the substrate or epilayer towards the interface, leaving a trailing edge component right at the interface. However, direct observation of such mechanisms has not been made in SiC before. In this work, we present an in situ study of the stress relaxation process, in which a specimen cut from a commercial 4H-SiC homoepitaxial wafer undergoes the stress relaxation process during a high-temperature heat treatment while sequential synchrotron white beam X-ray topographs were recorded simultaneously. Based on the dynamic observation of this process, it can be concluded that thermal stress plays a role in the relaxation process while the increased misfit strain at elevated temperature most likely drives the formation of an interfacial dislocation.



Edited by:

Robert Stahlbush, Philip Neudeck, Anup Bhalla, Robert P. Devaty, Michael Dudley and Aivars Lelis




J. Q. Guo et al., "Direct Observation of Stress Relaxation Process in 4H-SiC Homoepitaxial Layers via In Situ Synchrotron X-Ray Topography", Materials Science Forum, Vol. 924, pp. 176-179, 2018

Online since:

June 2018




* - Corresponding Author

[1] M. Skowronski and S. Ha, Journal of Applied Physics 99, 011101 (2006).

[2] S. Ha, et al., Journal of Crystal Growth 244, 257 (2002).

[3] H. Wang, et al., Materials Science Forum, 778-780, 328 (2014).

[4] F.C. Frank and J.H. van der Merwe, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A 198, 216 (1949).

[5] J.H. van der Merwe, Journal of Applied Physics 34, 117 (1963).

[6] J.W. Matthews and A.E. Blakeslee, Journal of Crystal Growth 27, 118 (1974).

[7] J.W. Matthews, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology 12, 126 (1975).

[8] H. Jacobson, et al., Applied Physics Letters 82, 3689 (2003).

[9] H. Tsuchida, et al., Materials Science Forum 556-557, 271 (2007).

[10] X. Zhang, et al., Journal of Applied Physics 101, 053517 (2007).

[11] M. Dudley, et al., MRS Advances, 1(2), 91 (2016).

[12] R.E. Stahlbush, et al., Materials Science Forum 821-823, 387 (2015).

[13] A. Danilewsky, et al., Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B 268, 399 (2010).

[14] J. Guo, et al., Journal of Electronic Materials 46(4), 2040 (2017).

[15] X. Zhang, et al., Journal of Applied Physics 102, 093520 (2007).

[16] Y. Yang, J. Guo, B. Raghothamachar, M. Dudley, S. Weit, A.N. Danilewsky, P.J. McNally, and B.K. Tanner, Materials Science Forum (submitted to These Proceedings in 2017).

[17] P. Yang., G.S. Green, and B.K. Tanner, Institute of Physics Conference Series 100, 467-471 (1989).

[18] G.S. Green, N. Loxley and B.K. Tanner, Journal of Applied Crystallography 24, 304 (1991).

[19] X. Zhang, M. Nagano, and H. Tsuchida, Materials Science Forum 679-680, 306 (2011).

[20] X. Zhang, T. Miyazawa, and H. Tsuchida, Materials Science Forum 717-720, 313 (2012).

[21] H. Chung, M. Skowronski, Journal of Crystal Growth 259, 52 (2003).

[22] M. Stockmeier, et al., Journal of Applied Physics 105, 033511 (2009).

[23] S. Sasaki, J. Suda, and T. Kimoto, Materials Science Forum 717-720, 481 (2012).