Control of HF Volatile Contamination in FOUP Environment by Advanced Polymers and Clean Gas Purge


Article Preview

Semiconductor manufacturing technologies have developed to the point where molecules, such as water, oxygen and airborne molecular contaminants (AMCs), have become detrimental in specific process conditions. Front Opening Unified Pods (FOUPs) are designed as controlled microenvironments (MEs) that protect processed wafers from AMCs during storage and transport. However, it has been demonstrated that FOUPs are able to accumulate by sorption molecules outgassed by processed wafers. Such contaminants are then able to be subsequently released and transferred to other sensitive wafers leading to detrimental impact [1,2]. This cross-contamination scheme from FOUP to wafer was evidenced especially for volatile acids such as HF or HCl and is responsible of yield losses due to drastic corrosion issues or crystal growth on Cu, Al or TiN materials [1,3,4]. These cross contamination issues can be reduced or controlled using low sorption and outgassing polymer materials as previously reported [4,5]. Another AMC control measure is to purge the FOUP with a dry gas. This provides several advantages, for example, wafers are not easily oxidized thus preventing oxide layers, deposition of hydrocarbons and metal defects [6] However, there is no measured information about the purge impact has on AMC control inside a FOUP. The purpose of this paper is to show and quantify what effect two different FOUP polymers using nitrogen and clean dry air (CDA) purge have on the HF volatile acid control through the Cu-wafers storage.



Solid State Phenomena (Volume 219)

Edited by:

Paul Mertens, Marc Meuris and Marc Heyns






P. González-Aguirre et al., "Control of HF Volatile Contamination in FOUP Environment by Advanced Polymers and Clean Gas Purge", Solid State Phenomena, Vol. 219, pp. 247-250, 2015

Online since:

September 2014




[1] H. Fontaine and M. Veillerot. Plastic containers contamination by volatile acids: accumulation, release and transfer to Cu-surfaces during wafers storage. Solid State Phenomena, 134, (2008), 251-254.

DOI: 10.4028/

[2] H. Fontaine S. Cetre, M. Veillerot, A. Danel. Study of the volatile organic contaminants absorption and their reversible outgassing by FOUPs. Solid State Phenomena, 145-146, (2009), 143-146.

DOI: 10.4028/

[3] T.Q. Nguyen, H. Fontaine, Y. Borde, V. Jacob. Microelectronic Engineering, 105, 2013, 124-129.

[4] P. Gonzalez-Aguirre, H. Fontaine, C. Beitia, J. Ohlsen, J. Lundgren, FOUPs against AMCs: The HF case, Future Fabs International, 42, (2012), 80-86.

[5] P. González-Aguirre, H. Fontaine, C. Beitia, J. Ohlsen, J. Lundgren, P. Lee. A comparative study of the HF sorption and outgassing ability of different Entegris FOUP platforms and materials. Microelectronic Engineering, 105 (2013), 113-188.

DOI: 10.1016/j.mee.2012.12.005

[6] S.C. Hu, T.M. Wu, H.C. Lin, K. Hsu. Design and evaluation of a nitrogen purge system for the front opening unified pod (FOUP). Applied Thermal Engineering, 27, (2007), 1386-1393.

DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2006.10.028

[7] H.P. Wang, Y.K. Liu, P.S. Lee. Moisture and Oxygen Control in Wafer Microenvironments. Challenges and System Solutions. Entegris, Inc. (2010).

DOI: 10.1149/1.3360739

[8] International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors (ITRS), Yield Enhancement, 2013. (www. itrs. net).

In order to see related information, you need to Login.