Effect of Primary α-Al Morphology in Slurry on Segregation during 357 Semi-Solid Die Casting


Article Preview

Controlling the morphology of the microstructure of the slurry is important during semi-solid die casting. For this project, semi-solid slugs were produced using the SEED (Swirled Enthalpy Equilibrium Device) process, where a fully liquid metal is poured into a steel crucible and cooled into the semi-solid temperature range, and the crucible and slurry are then swirled and cooled to the appropriate temperature (and solid fraction) for semi-solid casting. The pouring temperature of the melt into the crucible during SEED processing has been shown to influence the morphology and size of the aluminum solid particles within the slurry, which can influence the distribution and segregation of the solid particles during die casting. In this study, a specially-designed die with a serpentine-shaped flow channel has been used to study the distribution of the solid particles during semi-solid die casting. The experimental results show that a dendritic structure is formed when the liquid is poured from a high temperature, while a globular semi-solid morphology is more easily formed when poured from a low superheat. The current results also show that a dendritic structure leads to severe segregation during die casting.



Solid State Phenomena (Volume 285)

Edited by:

Qiang Zhu, Ahmed Rassili, Stephen P. Midson and Xiao Gang Hu




H. Zhang et al., "Effect of Primary α-Al Morphology in Slurry on Segregation during 357 Semi-Solid Die Casting", Solid State Phenomena, Vol. 285, pp. 398-402, 2019

Online since:

January 2019




* - Corresponding Author

[1] Spencer D B, Mehrabian R, Flemings M C. Rheological behavior of Sn-15 pct Pb in the crystallization range[J]. Metallurgical Transactions, 1972, 3(7):1925-(1932).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02642580

[2] Flemings M C. Behavior of metal alloys in the semisolid state[J]. Metallurgical Transactions A, 1991, 22(5):957-981.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02661090

[3] Flemings M C, Riek R G, Young K P. Rheocasting[J]. Materials Science & Engineering, 1976, 25(SEP-O):103-117.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-5416(76)90057-4

[4] Liang X K, Li D Q, Luo M, et al. Effects of Grain Refiner on the Microstructural Evolution during Making Semi-Solid Slurry of the A357 Alloy[J]. Solid State Phenomena, 2016, 256:88-93.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/ssp.256.88

[5] Atkinson H V. Modelling the Semisolid Processing of Metallic Alloys[J]. Cheminform, 2005, 36(43):341-412.

[6] Alhawari K S, Omar M Z, Ghazali M J, et al. Microstructural evolution during semisolid processing of Al–Si–Cu alloy with different Mg contents[J]. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2017, 27(7):1483-1497.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s1003-6326(17)60169-9

[7] Neag A, Favier V, Bigot R, et al. Comparison between numerical simulation of semisolid flow into a die using FORGE ©, and in situ, visualization using a transparent sided die[J]. Journal of Materials Processing Tech, 2016, 229:338-348.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.09.035

[8] Liu Z, Mao W M, Liu X M. Effect of pouring temperature on fractal dimension of primary phase morphology in semi-solid A356 alloy[J]. Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals (English Edition), 2009, 19(5):1098-1103.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s1003-6326(08)60413-6

[9] Côté P, Larouche M E, Chen X G. New Developments with the SEED Technology[J]. Solid State Phenomena, 2013, 192-193:373-378.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/ssp.192-193.373