Enhancing Properties of Clay Mortars Using Nano-Additives


Article Preview

Earthen materials have been used in construction for centuries. Nowadays, a certain appeal towards natural materials rose again due to the various benefits they hold. Besides being inexpensive and approachable, earthen construction offers a clear sustainable method of modern manufacturing. Since earthen materials present high absorption and relatively low compressive strength, the main purpose of this study was to enhance these abilities of clay-based mortars using nanoadditives. To achieve the mechanical and physical invigoration of the clay matrix two different compositions were fabricated by the use of nanoclay, nanosilica and nanoalumina. The addition of nanoclay (NC) at 5%w/w of binder, indicated a lower water absorption and an increase in mechanical properties, while the use of nanosilica and nanoalumina combined at 1.5% and 1% w/w of binder respectively, outline a less stable and compact structure.



Solid State Phenomena (Volume 286)

Edited by:

Luz Stella Gomez-Villalba




A. Karozou et al., "Enhancing Properties of Clay Mortars Using Nano-Additives", Solid State Phenomena, Vol. 286, pp. 145-155, 2019

Online since:

January 2019




* - Corresponding Author

[1] G. Minke, Building with earth, design and technology of a sustainable architecture. Basel- Berlin-Boston: Birkhäuser – Publishers for Architecture, (2006).

[2] B. Berge, The ecology of building materials., second ed., Architectural Press, Elsevier Science, (2009).

[3] F. Pacheco-Torgal, S. Jalali, Earth construction: Lessons from the past for future eco-efficient construction, Construction and Building Materials 29 (2012) 512–519.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.10.054

[4] H. Niroumand, M.F.M. Zain, M. Jamil and S. Niroumand, Earth Architecture from Ancient until Today, Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci. 89 (2013) 222–225.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.838

[5] Sameh, S. H., Promoting earth architecture as a sustainable construction technique in Egypt, J. Clean. Prod. 65 (2014) 362–373.

[6] V. Sharma, B.M. Marwahaa, H.K. Vinayak, Enhancing durability of adobe by natural reinforcement for propagating sustainable mud housing, International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment 5 (2016) 141–155.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2016.03.004

[7] H. Danso, B. Martinson, M. Ali and C. Mant, Performance characteristics of enhanced soil blocks: a quantitative review, Build Res Inf. 43(2) (2015) 253-262.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2014.933293

[8] I. Papayianni, V. Pachta,Constructional characteristics and restoration aspects of historic earth block structures, Res. Eng. Struct. Mat. 3(2) (2017) 113-12.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17515/resm2016.72st0726

[9] H. Niroumand, J. A. Barcelo, C.J. Kibert, and M. Saaly, Evaluation of Earth Building Tools in Construction (EBTC) in earth architecture and earth buildings, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 70 (2017) 861–866.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.267

[10] J. Nakamatsu, S. Kim, J. Ayarza, E. Ramirez, M. Elgegren and R. Aguilar, Eco-friendly modification of earthen construction with carrageenan: Water durability and mechanical assessment, Construction and Building Materials, 139 (2017) 193-202.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.062

[11] H.B. Nagaraj, M.V. Sravan, T.G. Aruna and K.S. Jagadish, Role of lime with cement in long-term strength of Compressed Stabilized Earth Blocks, International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment 3 (2014) 54–61.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2014.03.001

[12] V. Sharma, H.K. Vinayak, B.M. Marwaha, Enhancing compressive strength of soil using natural fibers, Construction and Building Materials 93 (2015) 943–949.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.05.065

[13] E.-S. Larsen, C.-B. Nielsen, Decay of bricks due to salts, Mater. Struct. 23 (1990) 16-25.

[14] M. Stefanidou, A. Karozou, Testing the effectiveness of protective coatings on traditional bricks, Construction and Building Materials 111 (2016) 482–487.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.114

[15] L. Miccoli, U. Müller, P. Fontana, Mechanical behaviour of earthen materials: A comparison between earth block masonry, rammed earth and cob, Construction and Building Materials 61 (2014) 327–339.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.03.009

[16] J.E. Aubert, A. Fabbri, J.C. Morel, and P. Maillard, An earth block with a compressive strength higher than 45 MPa!, Construction and Building Materials 47 (2013) 366–369.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.068

[17] F. Fratini, E. Pecchioni, L. Rovero, U. Tonietti, The earth in the architecture of the historical centre of Lamezia Terme (Italy): Characterization for restoration, Applied Clay Science 53 (2011) 509–516.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2010.11.007

[18] B. Taallah, A. Guettala, The mechanical and physical properties of compressed earth block stabilized with lime and filled with untreated and alkali-treated date palm fiber, Construction and Building Materials 47 (2013) 366–369.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.007

[19] D. Ciancio, C.T.S. Beckett, J.A.H. Carraro, Optimum lime content identification for lime-stabilised rammed earth, Construction and Building Materials 53 (2014) 59–65.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.11.077

[20] R. Eires, A. Camoes, S. Jalali, Enhancing water resistance of earthen buildings with quicklime and oil, Journal of Cleaner Production 142 (2017) 3281-3292.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.141

[21] B.R.T. Vilane, Assessment of stabilization of adobes by confined compression tests, Biosystems Engineering 106 (2010) 551–558.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2010.06.008

[22] A.S. Muntohar, Engineering characteristics of the compressed- stabilized earth brick, Construction and Building Materials 25 (2011) 4215–4220.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.04.061

[23] R.D.T. Filho, K. Ghavami, G.L. England, K. Scrivener, Development of vegetable fibre–mortar composites of improved durability, Cement & Concrete Composites 25 (2003) 185–196.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0958-9465(02)00018-5

[24] H. Danso, D.B. Martinson, M. Ali, J. Williams, Effect of fibre aspect ratio on mechanical properties of soil building blocks, Construction and Building Materials 83 (2015) 314–319.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.039

[25] R. Eires, A. Camoes, S. Jalali, Enhancing water resistance of earthen buildings with quicklime and oil, Journal of Cleaner Production 142 (2017) 3281-3292.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.141

[26] K. Elert, E. Sebastián, I. Valverde and C. Rodriguez-Navarro, Alkaline treatment of clay minerals from the Alhambra Formation: Implications for the conservation of earthen architecture, Applied Clay Science 39 (2008) 122–132.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2007.05.003

[27] H.N. Dhakal, N. Bennett, Titanium dioxide and zinc oxide nano-particulate enhanced oil-in-water (O/W) facade emulsions for improved masonry thermal insulation and protection, Energy Building 52 (2012) 86–92.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.05.027

[28] P. Manoudis, I. Karapanagiotis, A. Tsakalof, I. Zuburtikudis, K. Matziaris and C. Panayiotou, Surface properties of superhydrophobic coatings for stone protection, Proceedings of the International Symposium, Stone Consolidation in Cultural Heritage, Research and Practice, Laboratorio Nacional de Engenharia Civil, Lisbon, 6–7 May, 2008, p.193.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/jnanor.8.23

[29] C. Nunes and Z. Slížková, Hydrophobic lime based mortars with linseed oil: Characterization anddurability assessment, Cement and Concrete Research 61–62 (2014) 28–39.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2014.03.011

[30] M. Stefanidou, A. Karozou, and M. Kapsimani, Protecting adobes by increasing their hydrophobicity using alternative methods, 5th International Conference YOCOCU 21st–23rd September, Madrid, Spain, (2016).

[31] P. Pahlavan, St. Manzia, M.T. Rodriguez-Estrada, M.C. Bignozzi, Valorization of spent cooking oils in hydrophobic waste-based lime mortars for restorative rendering applications, Construction and Building Materials 146 (2017) 199–209.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.001

[32] Justnes H., Østnor T. A. and Barnils Vila N., Vegetable oils as water repellents for mortars, (2014), https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264849005.

[33] A. Tabarsa, N. Latifi, C. L. Meehan, K. N. Manahiloh, Laboratory investigation and field evaluation of loess improvement using nanoclay – A sustainable material for construction, Construction and Building Materials 158 (2018) 454–463.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.096

[34] P. Scarfato, L. D. Maio, M. L. Fariello, P. Russo and L. Incarnato, Preparation and evaluation of polymer/clay nanocomposite surface treatments for concrete durability enhancement, Cement & Concrete Composites 34 (2012) 297–305.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2011.11.006

[35] N. Venkat Rao, M. Rajasekhar, K. Vijayalakshmi, M. Vamshykrishna, The Future of Civil Engineering with the Influence and Impact of Nanotechnology on Properties of Materials, Procedia Materials Science 10 (2015) 111 – 115.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mspro.2015.06.032

[36] R.S.C. Woo, H. Zhu, M.M.K. Chow, C.K.Y. Leung, J.K. Kim, Barrier performance of silane–clay nanocomposite coatings on concrete structure, Composites Science and Technology 68 (2008) 2828–2836.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.10.028

[37] M. S. Morsy, S. H. Alsayed and M. Aqel, Effect of Nano-clay on Mechanical Properties and Microstructure of Ordinary Portland Cement Mortar, International Journal of Civil & Environmental Engineering IJCEE-IJENS (2010) Vol:10 No:01.

[38] R. Siddique, J. Klaus, Influence of metakaolin on the properties of mortar and concrete: A review, Applied Clay Science 43 (2009) 392–400.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2008.11.007

[39] M.S.M. Norhasri, M.S. Hamidah, A.M. Fadzil, Applications of using nano material in concrete: A review, Construction and Building Materials 133 (2017) 91–97.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.005

[40] T. Darmanin, F. Guittard, Wettability of conducting polymers: From superhydrophilicity to superoleophobicity, Progress in Polymer Science 39 (2014) 656–682.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.10.003