Energy Changes and the Lattice Resistance

W.J. Clegg; L. Vandeperre; J.E. Pitchford

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.317-318.271

Paper Titles

High Pressure / Low Temperature Sintering of Nanostructured Titania by Internal Heating Method
p.255

Growth of Carbon Nanotubes on Surface of Carbon Fibers Rod
p.259

On the Dissolution of WC in WC-Co Alloys
p.263

Conventional Sintering Route for the Production of Alumina-Based Nanocomposites: A Microstructural Characterization
p.267

Energy Changes and the Lattice Resistance
p.271

Shot Peening - A New Method for Improving Mechanical Properties of Structural Ceramics
p.277

Critical Frontal Process Zone Size and R-Curve Behavior of Porous Ceramics
p.281

Characteristics of Machining Damage and Their Influence on Strength in Alumina Ceramics System
p.285

Estimation of Residual Stress in a Ceramic Coating Layer
p.289

HomeKey Engineering MaterialsKey Engineering Materials Vols. 317-318Energy Changes and the Lattice Resistance

Energy Changes and the Lattice Resistance

Abstract:

The aim of this paper is to study the effect of relaxing the assumption in the Peierls analysis that the dislocation must be wide compared to the atom spacing. To do this the use of the continuum description of the in-plane strains caused by the presence of an edge dislocation is replaced by an atomistic interaction taken to be linear elastic. It is found that in this case the inplane interactions give a contribution to the overall misfit energy changes that are not present in the Peierls analysis because of the use of a continuum approach. This contribution modifies these energy changes so that the total misfit energy is a minimum at the conventional low energy positions (whereas in the Peierls analysis it is a maximum) and gives values of the Peierls stress in reasonable agreement with those measured.