Residual Strength after Low Velocity Impact in Carbon-Epoxy Laminates

Article Preview

Abstract:

The aim of present work is to study the influence of low energy impacts on residual strength of carbon-epoxy laminates. Experimental tests were performed on [0,90,0,90]2s and [0,90]8 laminates using a drop weight-testing machine. The influence of the laminate stacking sequence is analysed under 1.5 J, 2 J, 2.5 J and 3 J impact energies, corresponding to a 0.91 ms-1, 1.05 ms-1, 1.18 ms-1 and 1.29 ms-1 of impact velocity, respectively. The impacted plates were inspected by CScan to evaluate the size, shape and position of the delaminations through the thickness of the plate. The same plates were inspected by C-Scan before the impact, to evaluate the eventual presence of defects produced during the manufacturing process. The residual flexural strength showed that the [0,90,0,90]2s laminates have better performance than the [0,90]8 ones. The explanation is related with the lower flexural stiffness of the antisymmetric lay-up relatively to the symmetric one.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 514-516)

Pages:

624-628

Citation:

Online since:

May 2006

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2006 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] F. Collombet, J. Bonini and J.L. Lataillade: Intern. Journ. for Numerical Meth. in Engineering Vol. 39 (1996), pp.1491-1516.

Google Scholar

[2] S. Zheng and C. Sun: Engineering Fracture Mechanics Vol. 59 (1998), pp.225-240.

Google Scholar

[3] M.F.S.F. Moura and A.T. Marques: Composites, Part A Vol. 33 (2002), pp.361-368.

Google Scholar

[4] S. Hitchen and S. Kemp: Composites Vol. 26 (1995), pp.207-214.

Google Scholar

[5] E. Fuoss, P.V. Straznicky and C. Poon: Composite Structures Vol. 41 (1998), pp.177-186.

Google Scholar

[6] A.M. Amaro, J.B. Santos and J.S. Cirne: Insight Vol. 46, Nº 9, (2004), pp.559-565.

Google Scholar

[2] 6 8.

Google Scholar

[4] [0] 10.

Google Scholar

[1] 0. 5 1. 5.

Google Scholar

[2] J 2. 5 J Non impacted Displacement [mm] Load [kN].

Google Scholar

[2] 6 8.

Google Scholar

[4] [0] 10.

Google Scholar

[1] 0. 5 1. 5.

Google Scholar

[2] J Non impacted Displacement [mm] Load [kN].

Google Scholar