Protuberant Morphology of Electrospun Polymeric Fibers

Article Preview

Abstract:

A highly concentrated solution of polystyrene (PS) in N,N-dimethyl formamide (DMF) was electrospun and the surface morphology of the electrospun PS fibers was investigated. Unlike the porous morphology observed on the surface of the fibers electrospun from the PS solution in a volatile solvent, e.g. tetrahydrofuran, a regular protuberance morphology was found on the surface of the fibers electrospun from the PS solution in the non-volatile solvent, DMF. This unique surface morphology was formed due to the presence of residual DMF solvent inside the electrospun PS fiber. Due to the large diameter of the PS fibers (~5 to ~10 μm) formed from the highly viscous PS solution, the DMF could not evaporate completely from inside them during the electrospinning process. Therefore, the extrusive force of the residual solvent inside the fiber induced the formation of a unique surface morphology. We believe that this unique surface morphology increases the surface area of the electrospun fibers, thus making it possible to control their wetting or adsorption behavior.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 326-328)

Pages:

1849-1852

Citation:

Online since:

December 2006

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2006 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] D. Li and Y. Xia: Adv. Mater. Vol. 16 (2004), p.1151.

Google Scholar

[2] M. Bognitzki, W. Czado, T. Frese, A. Schaper, M. Hellwig, M. Steinhart, A. Greiner, J.H. Wendorff, Adv. Mater. Vol. 13 (2001), p.70.

DOI: 10.1002/1521-4095(200101)13:1<70::aid-adma70>3.0.co;2-h

Google Scholar

[3] J. Doshi and D.H. Reneker: J. Electrost. Vol. 35 (1995), p.151.

Google Scholar

[4] Y.M. Shin, M.M. Hohman, M.P. Brenner and G.C. Rutledge: Applied Physics Letters Vol. 78 (2001), p.1149.

Google Scholar

[5] E.H. Sanders, R. Kloefkorn, G.L. Bowlin, D.G. Simpson and G.E. Wnek: Macromolecules Vol. 36 (2003), p.3803.

Google Scholar

[6] F. Ko, Y. Gogotsi, A. Ali, N. Naguib, H. Ye, G. Yang, C. Li and P. Willis: Adv. Mater. Vol. 15 (2003), p.1161.

Google Scholar

[7] H. -J. Jin, S.V. Fridrikh, G.C. Rutledge and D.L. Kaplan: Biomacromolecules Vol. 3 (2002), p.1233.

Google Scholar

[8] K. Kim, C. Chang, Y.K. Luu, D. Fang, B.S. Hsiao, B. Chu and M. Hadjiargyrou: J. Control. Release Vol. 98 ( 2004), p.47.

Google Scholar

[9] M. Bognitzki, H. Hou, M. Ishaque, T. Frese, M. Hellwig, C. Schwarte, A. Schaper, J.H. Wendorff and A. Greiner: Adv. Mater. Vol. 12 (2000), p.637.

DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1521-4095(200005)12:9<637::aid-adma637>3.0.co;2-w

Google Scholar

[10] D. A. Czaplewski, J. Kameoka, R. Mathers, G. W. Coates and H. G. Craighead: Appl. Phys. Lett. Vol. 83 (2003), p.4836.

DOI: 10.1063/1.1633008

Google Scholar

[11] T. Jarusuwannapoom, W. Hongrojjanawiwat, S. Jitjaicham, L. Wannatong, M. Nithitanakul, C. Pattamaprom, P. Koombhongse, R. Rangkupan and P. Supahol: Euro. Polym. J. Vol. 41 (2005), p.409.

DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2004.10.010

Google Scholar

[12] L. Wannatong, A. Sirivat and P. Supaphol: Polym. Int. Vol. 53 (2004), p.1851.

Google Scholar

[13] S. Koombhongse, W. Liu and D.H. Reneker, J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys Vol. 39 (2001), p.2598.

Google Scholar

[14] K.H. Lee, H.Y. Kim, H.J. Bang, Y.H. Jung and S.G. Lee: Polymer Vol. 44 (2003), p.4029.

Google Scholar

[15] S. Megelski, J.S. Stephens, D.B. Chase and J.F. Rabolt, Macromolecules Vol. 35 (2002), p.8456.

Google Scholar

[16] C.L. Casper, J.S. Stephens, N.G. Tassi, D.B. Chase and J.F. Rabolt: Macromolecules Vol. 37 (2004), p.573.

Google Scholar