[1]
Euro Fracture Toughness Data Base. Project No. MAT-CT-940080.
Google Scholar
[2]
ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section III: Nuclear Power Plant Components, New York, (1995).
Google Scholar
[3]
RCC-M, Design and construction rules for mechanical components of PWR nuclear power plants, EdF and Framatome, (2000).
Google Scholar
[4]
KTA 3201. 2 Komponenten des Primärkreises von Leichtwasserreaktoren. Konstruktion und Berechnung, (1996).
Google Scholar
[5]
PNAE G-7-002-86: Strength Calculations for Components and Pipelines of Nuclear Power Installations (in Russian), Energoatomizdat, Moscow, (1990).
Google Scholar
[6]
Brumovsky M: Check of Master Curve application to embrittled RPVs of WWER type reactors. Int. J. Pressure Vessels and Piping, 79. 2002. pp.715-721.
DOI: 10.1016/s0308-0161(02)00074-1
Google Scholar
[7]
Regulatory Guideline 3. 17 (draft): PTS Assessment of Reactor Pressure Vessel (in Hungarian). OAH, Budapest, (2005).
Google Scholar
[8]
Ritchie R O, Knott J F and Rice J R: On the relationship between critical tensile stress and fracture toughness in mild steel. J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 21, 1973. pp.395-410.
DOI: 10.2172/4442244
Google Scholar
[9]
Beremin F M: A local criterion for cleavage fracture of nuclear pressure vessel steel. Metallurgical Transactions, 14A, 1983. pp.2277-2287.
DOI: 10.1007/bf02663302
Google Scholar
[10]
Wallin K, Saario T and Törrönen K: Statistical model for carbide induced brittle fracture in steel. Metal Science, 18, 1984. pp.13-16.
DOI: 10.1179/030634584790420384
Google Scholar
[11]
Lin T, Evans A G and Ritchie R O: Statistical model of brittle fracture by transgranular cleavage. J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 34, 1986. pp.477-496.
DOI: 10.1016/0022-5096(86)90013-x
Google Scholar
[12]
Mudry F: A local approach to cleavage fracture. Nucl. Eng. Design, 105, 1987. p.6576.
Google Scholar
[13]
Anderson T L, Stienstra D and Dodds R H Jr: A Theoretical Framework for Addressing Fracture in the Ductile-Brittle Transition Region. In: Landes J D, McCabe D E and Boulet J A M (eds) Fracture Mechanics: Twenty-Fourth Volume, ASTM STP 1207, Philadelphia, 1994. pp.186-214.
DOI: 10.1520/stp13706s
Google Scholar
[14]
Balleteros A, Bros J and Brumovsky M: Applications of the Master Curve Approach to Irradiated Steels. In: Proc. 12th Int. Conf. Nucl. Engineering, Arlington, Virginia USA, 2004, ICONE12-49391.
DOI: 10.1115/icone12-49391
Google Scholar
[15]
Guidelines for Application of the Master Curve Approach to Reactor Pressure Vessel Integrity in Nuclear Power Plants. TRS No. 429, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, (2005).
Google Scholar
[16]
Zhang X Z, Knott J F: Review and perspective on approaches of evaluating cleavage fracture toughness of pressure vessel steels. In: Proc. 12th Int. Conf. Nucl. Engineering, Arlington, Virginia USA, 2004, ICONE12-49053.
DOI: 10.1115/icone12-49053
Google Scholar
[17]
Zhang X Z, Knott J F: The Statistical Modelling of Brittle Fracture in Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Steel Microstructures. Acta mater. 48, 2000. pp.2135-2146.
DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6454(00)00055-0
Google Scholar
[18]
Ortner S: Factors affecting the shape of the ductile-to-brittle transition. Int. J. Pressure Vessels and Piping, 79, 2002. pp.693-700.
DOI: 10.1016/s0308-0161(02)00072-8
Google Scholar
[19]
Margolin B Z et al: An engineering method for prediction of the fracture toughness temperature dependence for RPV steels. Int. J. Pressure Vessels and Piping, 80, 2003. pp.817-829.
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2003.12.005
Google Scholar
[20]
RD EO 0353-02: Methodology for Determination of RPV Service Life of VVER Reactors (in Russian), St. Petersburg-Moscow, (2000).
Google Scholar
[21]
VERLIFE Unified procedure for lifetime assessment of components and piping in WWER NPPs. EC 5th FP, (2003).
DOI: 10.1115/pvp2004-2962
Google Scholar
