Damage Assessment of Multi-Layered Composite Structure Using an Embedded Active Sensor Network

Article Preview

Abstract:

Targeted at improving the overall integrity of functionalised composite structure, an embedded sensor network technique was developed using circuited piezoelectric wafers. The technical difficulties due to sensor embedment, such as electrical insulation, were addressed. With Hilbert transform-based signal processing and a correlation-based identification algorithm, Lamb wave signals, excited and captured by the integrated sensor network, were evaluated for damage assessment. Effectiveness of the sensor network and proposed identification algorithm was demonstrated by identifying delamination in orthotropic woven fabric CF/EP composite laminates. Excellent identification capacity of the built-in sensor network indicates its considerable application potential in providing high-fidelity data acquisition/condition monitoring for composite structures.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 334-335)

Pages:

461-464

Citation:

Online since:

March 2007

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2007 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Y.L. Koh, N. Rajic, W.K. Chiu and S. Galea: Comp. Struct. 47(1999), p.745.

Google Scholar

[2] M. Lin and F. -K. Chang: Comp. Sci. Tech. 62(2002), p.919.

Google Scholar

[3] C. Boller: Smart Mater. Struct. 10(2001), p.432.

Google Scholar

[4] Z. Su and L. Ye: J. Intel. Mater. Sys. Struct. 16(2005), p.97.

Google Scholar

[5] W. Staszewski, C. Boller and G. Tomlinson: Health Monitoring of Aerospace Structures (Wiley, England, 2004).

Google Scholar

0 1. 0x10-4.

Google Scholar

[2] 0x10-4.

Google Scholar

[3] 0x10-4 -1. 0 -0. 5.

Google Scholar

[1] 0 Time � s@ Benchmark Plate Normalised Amplitude.

Google Scholar

0 1. 0x10-4.

Google Scholar

[2] 0x10-4.

Google Scholar

[3] 0x10-4 -1. 0 -0. 5.

Google Scholar

[1] 0 Normalised Amplitude Time � s@ Delaminated Plate Fig. 3 de-noised Lamb wave signals of benchmark (left) and delaminated (right) plates.

Google Scholar

0 1. 0x10-4.

Google Scholar

[2] 0x10-4.

Google Scholar

[3] 0x10-4.

Google Scholar

[1] 0 Normalised Amplitude Time � s@ Benchmark Plate.

Google Scholar

0 1. 0x10-4.

Google Scholar

[2] 0x10-4.

Google Scholar

[3] 0x10-4.

Google Scholar

[1] 0 Delaminated Plate Normalised Amplitude Time � µµµµs@ Fig. 4 Energy distribution of Lamb wave signals described in Fig. 3.

Google Scholar

0 50. 0µ 100. 0µ 150. 0µ 200. 0µ 250. 0µ 300. 0µ 350. 0µ.

Google Scholar

[1] 0 Correlation Coefficient Time Difference ∆∆∆∆T [s] Benchmark Plate.

Google Scholar

0 50. 0µ 100. 0µ 150. 0µ 200. 0µ 250. 0µ 300. 0µ 350. 0µ.

Google Scholar

[1] 0 Time Difference ∆∆∆∆T [s] Correlation Coefficient Delaminated Plate.

Google Scholar

0 50. 0µ 100. 0µ 150. 0µ 200. 0µ 250. 0µ 300. 0µ 350. 0µ.

Google Scholar

[1] 4 Ratio of Correlation Coefficient Time Difference ∆∆∆∆T [s] Fig. 5 Correlation curve of energy envelope for signals in Fig. 4. Fig. 6. Correlated ratio of delaminated to benchmark plates.

Google Scholar