Paper Titles
A Dynamic Damage Model for Uniaxial Compressive Response of AD90 Alumina
p.289
Three Modes of Penetration Mechanisms of A3 Steel Cylindrical Projectiles Impact onto 45 Steel Plates
p.295
On Dynamical Systems at the Portevin-Le Chatelier Effect
p.301
Periodic Motions and Bifurcations of a Plastic Impact Machine
p.307
Improvement of Measurement Accuracy of Non-Coaxial Hopkinson Bar Method
p.313
Deformation and Failure Behaviors of PC/ABS (50/50) Blends under Impact
p.319
Finite Element Analysis of Alternate Hard and Soft Multi-Layers under Circumscription Loading
p.325
Development of Stereolithography Simulation Process Based on the Dynamic Finite Element Method
p.329
The Elasto-Plastic and Geometrically Nonlinear Finite Element Model of Space Beam Considering Restraint Torsion
p.335

Improvement of Measurement Accuracy of Non-Coaxial Hopkinson Bar Method

Article Preview

Abstract:

The high measurement accuracy in dynamic tension testing is required for designs and numerical simulations based on the accurate modeling of stress-strain relations at various strain-rates. The non-coaxial Hopkinson bar method (NCHBM) is one of the recently proposed methods for dynamic tension tests. In this study, the accuracy of the stress-strain relations obtained on the basis of NCHBM was investigated by the analysis based on FEM and by experiment. The FE models of NCHBM apparatus and plate-type specimens of various dimensions were made in detail. The target materials employed in this study were mild steel and SUS316 stainless steel. The effects of the rising, the dimensions of specimen, and the strain rate were examined systematically. The results calculated for the specimens of SUS316 were compared with those obtained by experiment. At last, the improving methods of the specimen fixation were proposed.

You might also be interested in these eBooks
Engineering Plasticity and Its Applications View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 340-341)

Pages:

313-318

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.340-341.313

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

June 2007

Authors:

Tsutomu Umeda, Koji Mimura, Masaki Makino

Keywords:

Finite Element Model (FEM), Measurement Accuracy, Non-Coaxial Hopkinson Bar Method

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

© 2007 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

References

[1] H. Kolsky: Proceedings of the Physical Society of London, Vol. 62 B (1949), p.676.

Google Scholar

[2] L.S. Costin and J. Duffy: Trans. ASME, J. Eng. Mater. Technol., Vol. 101 (1979), p.258.

Google Scholar

[3] E. El-Magd, K.J. Hellwig, H.G. Höck, and M. Homayun: Steel Res., Vol. 58 (1987), p.33.

Google Scholar

[4] T. Nicholas: Experimental Mechanics, Vol. 21 (1981), p.177.

Google Scholar

[5] K. Miura, S. Takagi, O. Hira, O. Furukimi, and S. Tanimura: SAE Technical Paper Series, Vol. 980952 (1998), p.23.

DOI: 10.4271/980952

Google Scholar

[6] T. Umeda, H. Umeki and K. Mimura: JSME International Journal, Vol. 48-4, Ser. A (2005), p.215.

Google Scholar

[7] LS-DYNA Ver. 950 USER'S MANUAL, California, Livermore Software Technology Corporation, (2000).

Google Scholar

[8] G.R. Johnson and W.H. Cook: Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Ballistics, Am. Def. Prep. Org. (ADPA), Netherlands, (1983), p.541.

Google Scholar

[9] A. Kitada, T. Umeda, K. Mimura, and S. Tanimura: Transactions of Japan Soc. Mech. Eng., Vol. 70-690, Ser. A (2004), p.313 (in Japanese).

Google Scholar