Fatigue Life Analysis of Al 8090 Helicopter Fuselage Panels

Article Preview

Abstract:

Considering the aerospace structures, the advantages of Al-Li alloys in comparison with conventional aluminium alloys comprise relatively low densities, high elastic modulus, excellent fatigue and toughness properties, and superior fatigue crack growth resistance. Unfortunately, these alloys have some disadvantages due to highly anisotropic mechanical properties and due to a very high crack growth rate for microstructurally short cracks. This could mean relatively early cracking in high stress regions such as rivet holes in helicopter fuselage panels. Consequently a more accurate approach in fatigue life analysis is requested. Considering that the 8090 T81 aluminium alloy has been widely used in an helicopter structure, in particular in the bolted connection between the stringers and the modular joint frame in the rear of the fuselage, it is extremely important to found a reliable procedure for the fatigue life assessment of the component. Thus, using the results of experimental tests made on panel specimens, a FE general model and two submodels of the critical zone (involved in fatigue damage during the tests) have been modelled in order to investigate the complex state of stress near the rivets holes. These stress values obtained have been elaborated for a fatigue assessment.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 348-349)

Pages:

637-640

Citation:

Online since:

September 2007

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2007 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] K.V. Jata and E.A. Starke: J. Metal Trans. Vol. 17A (1986), p.1011.

Google Scholar

[2] K.T. Venkateswara and R.O. Ritchie: J. Metal Trans. Vol. 19A (1988), p.563.

Google Scholar

[3] M.R. Urban: Int. J. Fatigue Vol. 25 (2003), p.1013.

Google Scholar

[4] M.R. James: Scripta Metall. Vol. 21 (1987), p.783.

Google Scholar

[5] F. Guiu and R. Stevens: Fatigue Fracture Eng. Mater. Struc. Vol. 13 (1990), p.625.

Google Scholar

[6] Z.H. Shan, Z.G. Wang and Y. J. Zhang: Material Science Vol. 32 (1997), p.4673.

Google Scholar

[7] B. Atzori, P. Lazzarin and M. Quaresimin: Int. J. Fatigue Vol. 19 (1997), p.579.

Google Scholar

[8] P. Lazzarin, V. Milani and M. Quaresimin: Int. J. Fatigue Vol. 19 (1997), p.401.

Google Scholar

[9] J. Mackerle: Int J. Press. Vess. and Piping Vol. 80 (2003), p.253.

Google Scholar

[10] X. Deng and J.W. Hutchinson: Int. J. Mech. Sci. Vol. 40 (1998), pp.683-694.

Google Scholar

[11] D. Colombo, M. Giglio and A. Manes: Proc. IFC9 Int. Fat. Congress (2006), USA.

Google Scholar

[12] W.D. Pilkey, in Peterson's Stress concentration factors, Wiley Ed. (1997).

Google Scholar

[13] D.S. McDarmaid and C.J. Peel: Proc. of the 5 th Int. Al. -Liht. Conf. II, (1989), p.993.

Google Scholar

[14] D. Kosteas and R. Ondra: Proc. ICF8, Kiew, (1993).

Google Scholar