Determination of the Fatigue Behavior of Aluminide Coatings by Means of the Impact Testing Method

Article Preview

Abstract:

The impact testing is an efficient experimental method that enables the quantitative and qualitative determination of the fatigue resistance of mono- and multilayer coatings deposited on various substrates, which was not possible with the common testing methods previously available. In this paper the experimental assessment of the fatigue resistance of coatings working under cyclic loading conditions by means of the dynamic impact testing method is presented. The fatigue failure mode, such cohesive or adhesive, of the investigated coatings is determined using scanning electron and optical microscopy, as well as EDX analysis. Critical values of the stress components, responsible for distinctive fatigue failure modes of the coating substrate system are obtained and the fatigue limits of aluminide coatings are illustrated in simple diagrams containing the impact load versus the number of successive impacts that the examined aluminide-P91 system can withstand.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 348-349)

Pages:

645-648

Citation:

Online since:

September 2007

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2007 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] N.S. Stoloff: Mater. Sci. Eng. A258 (1998), p.1.

Google Scholar

[2] R.S. Sundar, R.G. Baligidad, Y.V.R.K. Prasad and D.H. Sastry: Mater. Sci. Eng. A258 (1998), p.219.

Google Scholar

[3] G.W. Goward: Surf. Coat. Technol. Vol. 108-109 (1998), p.73.

Google Scholar

[4] V. Paidar: Mater. Sci. Eng. A 234-236 (1997), p.15.

Google Scholar

[5] M. Yamaguchi, H. Inui and K. Ito: Acta Mater. Vol. 48 (2000), p.307.

Google Scholar

[6] K. Stein-Fechner, J. Konys and O. Wedemeyer: J. Nucl. Mater. Vol. 249 (1997), p.33.

Google Scholar

[7] R. Mevrel and P. Pichoir: Mater. Sci. Eng. Vol. 88 (1987), p.1.

Google Scholar

[8] R. Prescott and M.J. Graham: Oxid. Met. Vol. 38 (1992), p.73.

Google Scholar

[9] M.A. Montealegre, J.L. Gonzàlez-Carrasco, M.A. Morris-Munoz, J. Chao and D.G. Morris: Intermetallics Vol. 8 (2000), p.439.

Google Scholar

[10] C.D.N. Chan, C. Huvier and J.F. Dinhut: Intermetallics Vol. 9 (2001), p.817.

Google Scholar

[11] C. -H. Xu, W. Gao and Y. -D. He: Scripta Mater. Vol. 41 (2000), p.975.

Google Scholar

[12] D.B. Lee, G.Y. Kim and J.G. Kim: Mater. Sci. Eng. A339 (2003), p.109.

Google Scholar

[13] I. Rommerskirchen, B. Eltester and H.J. Grabke: Mater. Corros. Vol. 47 (1996), p.646.

Google Scholar

[14] D. Li, Y. Xu and D. Lin: J. Mater. Sci. Vol. 36 (2001), p.979.

Google Scholar

[15] V.S. Rao and V.S. Raja: Intermetallics Vol. 11 (2003), p.119.

Google Scholar

[16] F. Lang, Z. Yu, S. Gedevanishvili, S.C. Deevi and T. Narita: Intermetallics Vol. 11 (2003), p.697.

Google Scholar

[17] F. Lang, Z. Yu, S. Gedevanishvili, S.C. Deevi, S. Hayashi and T. Narita: Intermetallics Vol. 11 (2003), p.135.

Google Scholar

[18] A.A. Voevodin, R. Bantle, A. Matthews: Wear, Vol. 185 (1995), p.151.

Google Scholar

[19] R. Bantle, A. Matthews: Surface and Coatings Technology, Vol. 74-75 (1995), p.857.

Google Scholar

[20] W. Heinke, A. Leyland, A. Matthews, G. Berg, C. Friedrich, E. Broszeit: Thin Solid Films, Vol. 270 (1995), p.431.

DOI: 10.1016/0040-6090(95)06934-8

Google Scholar

[21] H. Ziegele, C. Rebholz, A.A. Voevodin, A. Leyland, S. L. Rohde, A. Matthews: Tribology International, Vol. 30, No. 12 (1997), p.845.

DOI: 10.1016/s0301-679x(97)00059-5

Google Scholar