Performance Assessment of Design Electrode in Ultrasonic-Aided of Freeform Surface Finishing

Article Preview

Abstract:

The most effective geometry for design electrode and the advantage of low cost equipment in ultrasonic-aided electrochemical finishing for a freeform surface following turning machining was investigated. The proposed design process used an effective electrode instead of the mate electrode as in conventional ECM. Hence higher electrical current is not required when the effective design electrode is used to reduce the response area. Through simple equipment attachment, electrochemical finishing can follow the traditional cutting on the same machine. The controlled factors included the chemical composition and concentration of the electrolyte, the initial gap width, the flow rate of electrolyte, workpiece rotational speed, and die material. The design electrode is primarily discussed among the factors affecting the electrochemical finishing. The experimental parameters were current rating, electrode feed rate, frequency , power level of ultrasonics, and electrode geometry. The effective design electrode with small wedge angle and small edge rounding radius had an optimal value for higher current density and provided larger discharge space, which produce a smoother surface. The electrode of globe-shape with small radius performed best in the finishing process. The electrochemical finishing needed only a short time to make the workpiece smooth and bright and save the need for the precise process of traditional machining. The ultrasonic-aided electrochemical finishing is recommended for the finishing process of the freeform surface.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 364-366)

Pages:

680-685

Citation:

Online since:

December 2007

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2008 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] R.W. Wood: The Physical and Biological Effects of High-frequency Sound-waves of Great Intensity, Philosophical Magazine, Sept. 7, (1927) pp.417-436.

DOI: 10.1080/14786440908564348

Google Scholar

[2] L.D. Rozenberg, V.F. Kazemtsev, L.O. Makrov and D.F. Yakhimovich: Ultrasonic Cutting, Consultants Bureau, New York, (1964).

Google Scholar

[3] H. Hocheng and C.C. Hsu.: Preliminary Study of Ultrasonic Drilling of Fiber-Reinforced Plastics, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 48 (1995), pp.255-266.

DOI: 10.1016/0924-0136(94)01657-m

Google Scholar

[4] J.M. AZCUE: Comparison of Different Cleaning Procedures of Root Material for Analysis of Trace Elements, Intern. J. Environ. Anal. Chem., Vol. 62 (1995), pp.137-145.

DOI: 10.1080/03067319608027060

Google Scholar

[5] J. Wilson: Practice and Theory of Electrochemical Machining, (1971), pp.79-161.

Google Scholar

[6] J. Bannard: Effect of Flow on the Dissolution Efficiency of Mild Steel during ECM, Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, Vol. 7 (1977), pp.267-270.

DOI: 10.1007/bf00618995

Google Scholar

[7] M.A. LaBada and L.M. Mc Millan: A New Electrolyte for Electrochemical Machining, Electro. Tech., 5(7-8), (1967), pp.340-345.

Google Scholar

[8] B.H. Kim, S.H. Ryu, D.K. Choi and C.N. Chu: Micro electrochemical milling, Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, Vol. 15 (2005), pp.124-129.

DOI: 10.1088/0960-1317/15/1/019

Google Scholar

[9] P.S. Pa and H. Hocheng: Using Borer-Shape Electrode in Electrochemical Smoothing of Holes, Materials Science Forum, Vol. 505-507 (2006), pp.793-798.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.505-507.793

Google Scholar

[10] S.S. Rao: Engineering Optimization. John Wiley and Sons, (1996).

Google Scholar

[11] J.A. McGeough: Principles of Electrochemical Machining, (1974), pp.1-10.

Google Scholar